View more on these topics

Stephen Womack: The part of the Budget setting alarm bells ringing


During my 20 years as a financial journalist, Budget days sometimes turned out to be a bit of a damp squib. It was a case of scouring the small print in the hope of finding something interesting and different to write about.

Not so in the case of Osborne’s Budget 2014. In a delicious irony, my first Budget as a fully-fledged IFA turned out to be an absolute crackerjack. Simplified Isas, a pension revolution, voluntary top-ups to the State Pension – there is a lot to get your head around.  At David Williams IFA we are already looking forward to exploring some of the new freedoms with clients.

Some fear that an end to GAD limits or the straight-jacket of an annuity will see savers draining their pension quicker than a Lamborghini blasting off the lights.

But, we expect that the freedom to draw whatever you want, whenever you want from your pension will have the opposite effect for many of our clients. It takes away any pressure to keep drawing income just to get money out of a restricted pension environment. In future it will make more sense to leave funds within the tax-favoured pension wrapper until you actually have an immediate need for it.

However, one section of the “Freedom and choice in pensions” consultation paper has got alarm bells ringing. Blocking transfers from defined benefit to defined contribution schemes could seriously disadvantage a minority of scheme members.

These are those individuals who, for a variety of reasons, do not want or need the “one-size-fits-all” approach of a regular DB scheme pension. They might be single, so have no need for spouse’s benefits, or have a health condition that makes an enhanced annuity a more attractive option. They may want the flexibility to vary their income, perhaps boosting it for a few years until other pensions start or their State Pension is paid before then scaling back income to preserve some inheritable value.

For most people, most of the time, staying with a secure defined benefit pension is still likely to be the best outcome. That is why the Financial Conduct Authority rightly says the starting point for any advice should be that a transfer is not suitable. It is up to the adviser to demonstrate that, for a particular client at a particular time, there is a genuine reason why they need a tailored pension through DC rather than a one-size fits all through DB.

The Government has concerns about the economic effects of a mass outflow from DB, especially from unfunded public sector schemes. I understand these fears. But there is a definite case for greater flexibility than the current proposals suggest.

A beefed-up advice process might well be at the heart of a solution that balances the interests of both pension funds and their members. There are already stringent criteria for advising on DB transfers – for those clients who actually take advice.

Making regulated advice compulsory, with perhaps some revised criteria on what makes an appropriate transfer, could stem the outflows and guard against the horrors of a frenzy of pension liberation without completely closing the door to those with a real need for something other than the one-size-fits-all defined benefit pension.

Stephen Womack is an adviser with David Williams IFA Chartered Financial Planners


Pensions-savings-retirement-piggy bank

Pensions regulator could introduce mandatory master trust licences

The Pensions Regulator could introduce mandatory licensing for master trusts if take-up of its voluntary “assurance” framework is poor. TPR has today published details of a new voluntary master trust standard designed to boost auto-enrolment scheme quality. The framework sets out how trustees should report against a range of objectives related to governance and administration. […]


Danby Bloch: Why the Govt’s state pension top up is such a good deal

From October 2015, some clients will be able to top up their state pension by making the new Class 3 national insurance contributions. The deal will be very good for most people who qualify, so advisers need to make sure that these clients have enough funds to be able to make this investment. Advisers should […]

Yearsley-Ben-Charles Stanley-peach.jpg

Ben Yearsley: VCTs must keep investors in the loop

The Government and HM Revenue & Customs do not like limited life venture capital trusts and have not done for some time, because they are essentially companies that get tax breaks for no apparent reason. They have made several attempts to tighten the rules around where tax breaks are permitted. But they have been a […]


How the IPTF is hoping seven families can shake-up protection

Income protection is “historically undersold”, with only 91,000 individual policies sold last year despite a potential market of 20 million people. People are more likely to find themselves unable to work due to injury or illness but confusion over how much state benefits pay out in the event of unemployment has left IP sales lagging behind life and […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Interesting read and I would agree that staying with a secure defined benefit pension is still the best outcome – however I was just reading the following – do you think that the analysts are right in estimating that there will be no defined benefit pension schemes open to new FTSE 100 hires in the years to come?

  2. DB schemes are a huge drain on the public purse and are also a millstone around many employers necks. I would have thought encouraging this who preferred to control their own destiny and wanted more flexibility to leave would be a profitable and sound economic move for both State and Private Sector employers.

    In addition the new DD flexibility means that the fund can be run down to death at the identified mortality planning age which generally means a yield of between 5%-6% compared to a comparative 12% CY from a traditional TVAS.

    The only reason I can imagine the chancellor has made these proposals is that he want DB members to continue to provide cheap financing of the national debt rather than allowing them to invest in companies that are trying to provide economic growth.

    MISGUIDED is what I would call this policy and ultimately economically costly for the country as a whole.

  3. I worked as an IFA for 17years with the Co-op Bank and really want to move the fund [ about £300,000] into my private pension…simply because I don’t trust the buggers!!

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm