View more on these topics

Stephen Womack: Osborne must listen to pension tax relief views

Stephen-Womack-MM-Peach-700.png

Treasury officials will be working overtime in the next few weeks digesting the responses to the latest consultation on pension tax relief, which closed last week.

Chancellor George Osborne has asked whether today’s model of tax-free contributions and growth, then taxed pension income, is still the best way to encourage a healthy savings culture.

You can understand why he asks. Pension tax relief costs the exchequer £50bn a year in lost income tax and National Insurance. Two thirds of this money goes to support the pensions of the richest 10 per cent of society: the 40 per cent and 45 per cent taxpayers. In an age of austerity, these numbers probably make uncomfortable reading for the Chancellor.

Many also argue the current system is complex, with the value of tax relief opaque, especially to those in workplace pensions. Politicians want voters to appreciate it when public money is spent on their behalf and £50bn a year pays for a lot of new, and highly visible, nurses, schools and roads.

Ideas already suggested to the Government include a switch to flat rate of tax relief, say 30 per cent, or a system whereby you would contribute to a pension from taxed income and then that contribution is matched by the Government up to a certain level.

In proposing any new system, however, George Osborne needs to be very cautious of unintended consequences.

He has already taken big steps towards curbing the tax relief bill for top earners. The lifetime allowance has come down from £1.5m to £1.25m and falls again to £1m from next April. This has been combined with a cut in the annual allowance to £40,000. The Treasury says these steps will cut £6bn from the cost of tax relief. The tapered annual allowance from next April will go even further, restricting contributions to just £10,000 for the highest earners.

These steps alone have caused a pensions “pinch point” for some key groups of workers. Take hospital doctors and GPs: many of those with long service in the NHS are finding themselves in positions where their ability to accrue meaningful extra pensions is very limited. This, in turn, is causing them to reassess their position and look at their work life/balance.

Some are already planning to cut their NHS hours and substitute non-pensioned private work. Others, especially GPs who receive no employer payments into pension, are looking at early retirement, taking a reduced pension to avoid LTA issues. The net impact could be a significant exodus of experienced medics purely because of pension tax changes at a time when the NHS is under huge pressure.

Elsewhere, the Trades Union Congress warned at its conference last month that company executives are increasingly becoming disengaged from pensions, primarily because they can no longer benefit themselves.

Whitehall policymakers need to be cautious that any further overhaul of tax relief does not end up exacerbating the problem. For example, if they decide to introduce a flat rate relief at 30 per cent, is there still the need for a lifetime allowance? Probably not.

The Chancellor has shown he is prepared to listen and adapt in the past: a proposal last year to ban any transfer away from a defined benefit scheme was quickly reversed. His ears need to be wide open on this issue too.

Stephen Womack is a chartered financial planner at David Williams IFA

Recommended

8

Pension Wise staff redeployed amid low take-up

Pension Wise guidance staff who do not have appointments booked are being redeployed, Money Marketing can reveal. The Treasury has given The Pensions Advisory Service clearance to use Pension Wise staff on its existing helpline. Likewise, Citizens Advice says Pension Wise staff, who are funded by a levy on financial services firms, can also work […]

HM-Treasury-500x320.jpg

Govt eyes pension guidance cuts over duplication concerns

The Government is considering “rationalising” the guidance services offered by the Money Advice Service and Pension Wise to reduce duplication between the offerings. Currently, pension guidance is provided through Citizens Advice and the The Pensions Advisory Service in the form of Pension Wise, while the MAS also publishes retirement savings information on its website. In a […]

HM-Treasury-500x320.jpg
6

Govt and FCA launch review to boost access to advice

The Government and the FCA have launched a much-anticipated review of the advice market aimed at improving access to advice. The Financial Advice Market Review will explore what kind of support consumers want access to, whether any advice gaps exist, how they can be closed, and what role technology such as robo-advice could play. There […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Stewart Tomlinson 12th October 2015 at 5:02 pm

    Thanks, Stephen, for a well thought out and presented article. Have the rules for GPs changed; I always thought there was a nominal 6% personal contribution to the NHSSS?

  2. Excellent article’ but we must be careful of quoting the figure of £50 billion as a significant proportion of this relates to DB schemes (including the public sector) and it seems highly likely that DB would be excluded.

    Not only would Osborne be wary of destroying the last bastions of DB, his boss has already made a “cast iron” commitment to “no change to public sector pensions for this parliament” following the last settlement. The consensus seems to be somewhere around £20 billion for DC.

    The question around lost NI is interesting as, of course this relates to Employer NI (unless salary sacrifice is being used). It would be a brave Chancellor who increased employer pension costs by 13.8% with 1.8 million small and micro employers about to stage over the next 2 and a bit years!

    There is no doubt, however, that this is “easy pickings” for the Chancellor, but it’s up to us as an industry to lobby for a solution that encourages saving for all and promotes confidence in the pensions system.

  3. The government should not only stop meddling and tinkering with pensions but make a concerted effort to deliver what Pensions Simplification back in 2006 manifestly failed to. How else are people going to be encouraged to save now for later? The widespread feeling of antipathy towards anything to do with pensions is already going to take years to break down and further buggering about is only going to make that situation worse.

Leave a comment