View more on these topics

STEPHEN SKLAROFF

The Green Paper published in December 1998 identified a target group of 5.3 million people who do not have access to an occupational pension and are on moderate incomes. In answer to a Parliamentary question in January this year, pensions minister Jeff Rooker said the biggest group that will benefit comprises up to five million people whose income is between £10,000 and £20,000. Yet a number of studies have looked at these potential customers and many already have a personal pension or are under the age of 30. They seem more likely to be buying their first mortgage and life cover rather than putting spare cash into a pension.

Rooker went on to say: “That target group does not comprise the market for stakeholders. The market and the target group are different.” So while the Government might have had a customer profile in mind, the final stakeholder design is of pretty wide application. What is novel is that up to £3,600 a year can be contributed without reference to earnings. This allows grandparents or parents to invest for children or for people in work to make contributions for non-working partners.

A key problem with pension provision is not so much that people will not save at all but that they fail to save adequately. Certainly, stakeholder pensions might encourage more saving among wider groups because of their low charges and flexibility. The Government and the pension industry share this hope but expectations must be realistic. People on moderate incomes who are not saving adequately will be an important part of the stakeholder market for providers but it would be unrealistic to expect that the simple addition of another pension vehicle to the market will overcome behavioural barriers to saving. Success in reaching this market will have to be measured in a realistic fashion and further measures may be needed to maximise potential pension savings. It will be important for behavioural change to be carefully monitored so that any further policy changes can be based on evidence.

Stakeholder pensions will sit alongside other pension, savings and spending options. For moderate earners, the pressures on disposable income will be particularly intense. Many will choose to use increases in their disposable income to improve their immediate standard of living. Rainy-day savings might be the priority.

Even if the customer decides that pension saving is what they want, stakeholder will be just one market choice alongside personal pensions, some of which now offer very similar terms to stakeholder. The important thing is to measure the overall effect on long-term saving, not just the number of stakeholder policies taken out.

The challenge is to educate consumers that private pension provision of some kind is vital if they want to have a secure and comfortable retirement. The Government has a role to play here as well as bodies such as consumer groups and trade unions. The IFA role in stakeholder might shift towards reaching individuals via employers and affinity groups. Once the importance of pension saving is accepted, stakeholder pensions would seem well placed to offer people a secure and good value home for their investments.

Stephen Sklaroff is deputy director general of the ABI

Recommended

&#39Education funds more urgent than stakeholder&#39

Parents should consider investing for education before investing in stakeholder pensions for young children, says Tunbridge Wells Equitable Friendly Society. Chief executive David White is concerned that parents will be attracted by the tax breaks in stakeholder schemes and invest for their children without considering more pressing needs such as education. He thinks parents should […]

L&G admits it pushed for the 1% regime

Legal & General is coming under fire from IFAs for boasting that it actively promoted 1 per cent charges on stakeholder from the outset of the planning for the product. L&G says it was the only insurance company at the Government&#39s earliest working parties on stakeholder agreeing with a 1 per cent charging cap. In […]

EMX saved after rights issue fails to raise £6m

The failure of online fund trading platform EMX to raise £6m in a rights issue has led to six fund managers stepping in and save the company&#39s future development. Threadneedle, Fidelity, M&G, Scottish Widows, Standard Life and Invesco said they would come to the rescue of the project if it failed to raise £6m through […]

Opportunity is lost as stakeholder steamrollers in

IFAs are probably hoping stakeholder proves an elaborate April fool. Stakeholder could prove disastrous and at best will cause a great deal of pain for limited benefit. Thousands will misbuy because the 1 per cent charge cap precludes advice. Several traps, including the relationship with state benefits and contracting out, have been left unsprung. Decision […]

Is this the endgame for the current mergers & acquisitions boom?

Last year, worldwide mergers and acquisitions (M&A) rose to an unprecedented $4.7tn, according to Thomson Reuters, a 41 per cent increase over 2014. Anthony Forcione, senior equity analyst at Loomis Sayles, an affiliate of Natixis Global Asset Management, looks at what’s been driving this particular wave of mergers. Click here to view full article: Loomis-Sayles

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment