View more on these topics

Standard Life and Royal London pressure WPP over executive pay and succession

Standard Life and Royal London have used their shareholder power in WPP to urge the advertising giant to rethink its executive pay and succession plans.

Royal London holds £106m worth of shares in the firm, a 0.48 per cent stake. Standard Life’s interest is three times that level, at 1.5 per cent.

At WPP’s annual general meeting today, the firms were among a number of investors to push the company towards change on issues like executive pay and succession.

WPP chief executive Martin Sorrell was paid a total of £48m in 2016.

At the AGM, 21 per cent of shareholders either rebelled against the pay deal or abstained.

Royal London Asset Management corporate governance manager Ashley Hamilton Claxton said the firm is voting against WPP’s remuneration report.

She says: “Executive pay at WPP continues to look excessive. Whilst we acknowledge that the reduction in the total long term bonuses and incentives available to executives under the new remuneration policy is a step in the right direction, the sheer scale of these remains exceptionally high.”

Royal London also urged the company to make sure an adequate succession plan is in place for Sorrell’s departure, as “the biggest risk facing the company”.

In a letter to WPP’s chairman, Standard Life Investments governance and stewardship director Deborah Gilshan writes: “As a long term shareowner in WPP, we acknowledge the success that Sir Martin Sorrell and all of the team at the company, past and present, have achieved and the ensuing benefits of that success to our clients.

“Unusually, the chief executive’s service contract may be terminated by either the company or Sir Martin without any notice. Given this, we suggest that the board consider what lead time would be required to ensure an orderly succession and discuss this with Sir Martin. We would like the board to come to an agreement with him that, other things being equal, he will provide sufficient warning to meet this timeframe.”



BlackRock threatens votes against excessive executive pay

BlackRock has threatened to veto board director re-appointments at companies where top executives received disproportionate pay packets. BlackRock told MPs on the business, energy and industrial strategy committee yesterday that it will be sending a letter to 350 UK companies expressing its concerns over increasing salaries and pension contributions and how these are benchmarked. BlackRock’s […]


Schroders chief faces shareholder rebellion over pay

Schroders chief executive Peter Harrison faces a shareholder rebellion at the asset manager’s annual general meeting today over “inappropriate” pay. Harrison was paid £6.3m in 2016, 33 times more than the average Schroders employee, the Financial Times reports. Investor advisories Glass Lewis and Pirc have both urged investors to reject the “highly excessive” remuneration package, which is […]

Neil Liversidge: Advisers need to be straight with the media

Last month I wrote on how I became invol­ved with the broad­cast media. This time I want to offer some tips for other advisers interested in similarly developing their profile. Responding to my last column, Harry Katz warned about the “dangers of being misquoted or having your words twisted to suit the story or the […]

FAMR – a familiar response

Pension specialist Fiona Tait takes a look at the Financial Advice Market Review and assesses the three areas where it suggests improvements can be made With significant budget changes ruled out (for a while anyway), the pension community briefly turned its attention to the FCA’s final report on its Financial Advice Market Review (FAMR), hoping […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment