Standard Life Aberdeen fights back against Lloyds’ asset pull

Standard Life Aberdeen has hit back against Lloyds terminating investment management arrangements worth £109bn, saying the merged company is not in competition with the bank.

In February, the Scottish Widows Investment Partnership assets were pulled because Lloyds saw Standard Life as a rival.

In a stock exchange update today, Standard Life Aberdeen says it and Lloyds are involved in dispute resolution.

The future of Standard Life Aberdeen

The statement says: “SLA has informed LBG that it does not agree that, following the merger of Aberdeen Asset Management and Standard Life, SLA was in material competition in the UK with LBG and that, therefore, SLA does not consider that LBG, Scottish Widows or their respective affiliates has the right to terminate the [investment management arrangements].”

After the assets were pulled, reports emerged that a breakdown in talks to merge Lloyds’ Scottish Widows arm with Standard Life’s pension and life insurance business were behind the move.



Manager exodus continues at Standard Life Aberdeen

Another fund manager has left Standard Life Aberdeen to join a rival firm as the fund giant continues its restructuring post-merger. Imran Ahmad, an investment director and portfolio manager of the Emerging Market Debt Unconstrained fund, will join the multi-asset team at Investec Asset Management. Ahmad was in the emerging market debt specialists team at Standard […]

Fund pickers cut Aberdeen Standard Investments from portfolios

Fund selectors are reassessing or excluding Aberdeen Standard Investments funds in their portfolios, as questions remain around how the investment teams will pan out post-merger. Standard Life and Aberdeen Asset Management completed their £11bn mega-merger in August. At that time there were around 168 funds from the groups in the Investment Association sectors to be […]


Claimants to pursue Liberty Sipp over unregulated investments

A group of 27 investors is taking action against Liberty Sipp over allegations it was responsible for losses incurred from risky investments. Wixted & Co Solicitors has issued a case in the Circuit Commercial Court in Bristol against Liberty Sipp. The firm is also acting on behalf of investors in a claim against Berkeley Burke. […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Robert Milligan 8th May 2018 at 12:23 pm

    See, nothing to do with the Client and the stability we need to convince our clients to invest with them, its just the Big Houses maximising profit to hide their scurrilous remunerations.

    • Philip Castle 8th May 2018 at 6:17 pm

      I agree with you. a public spat over ownership of the CLIENTS money. I think any money in bonds which otherwise might be viewed as “sticky” money due to the tax implications of moving should be allowed to move with the provider meeting any tax on chargeable event which occurs. i.e. a free move respecting TCF principel 6, which teh FCA appears to allow provdiers to walk all over whilst making is PROVE we do it when we do it as part of our DNA!

Leave a comment