I find it it is necessary to peel back the marketing wrappers to reveal exactly what these innovations are, benefits and drawbacks and the suitability for clients.The siren calls of the marketing teams have waxed lyrically over the different strengths and benefits of their various multi-managers. A more objective comparison is needed. A more multi-dimensional approach to evaluate not just performance but other key elements is required. I believe there are three ways to do this. Total expense ratios – In a low-cost, low-inflation world, charges are going to be crucial and will be a key determinant as to whether a client has had an effective return on their funds. We should all know that full transparency is a prerequisite to the design and structure to all investment products. Those who are determined to cloak their costs behind opaque marketing will be exposed. The TERs within multimanagers can be complex and are often different from just the plain vanilla Annual Management Charges highlighted in brochures and adverts. All the more reason for clarity. Volatility – Most of us are not managing for the short term but rather the medium term. All the more reason then, to manage volatility in our clients’ portfolios and not to have irrational bungee-jumping brought about by short-term speculation. We have to regain investors’ confidence and not just bet on the latest fads. Diversification – To achieve effective management of volatility and improve our chances of predictability, effective and diversification over a range of asset classes is crucial. We hear of managers saying they are diversifying through spreading their equities around the globe – yes, all very well, but they are still equities. From the excitement of private equity to the tedium of index-linked investments, there is no shortage of choice. Yet to see most multi-managers’ breadth of investment, we seem to be stuck with just equities and fixed-interest investments. The point of the multi-manager process is to provide a consistency of performance. Being a star for a year or two may be self-gratifying but the fame will be illusory if the performance can’t be maintained. Justin Urquhart Stewart is a director of Seven Investment Management
Big may be beautiful once again. During the 1980s and 1990s, average annual returns of around 12 per cent above the rate of inflation were commonplace for blue chips.
Lenders are switching the focus of mortgage advertising from headline rates to promoting aspirational lifestyles to comply with stringent M-Day marketing rules. Companies say the rules for customers to receive clear and fair marketing messages have been a challenge. Bradford & Bingley spokeswoman Jessica Bigus says the need for details of each product to be […]
My local newspaper has again been running pieces this week on the usual autumn topics with headlines such as, Rising prices could leave old folk in the cold, etc. I do wonder how many of our older clients are still not aware of a great gas and electricity scheme called StayWarm. This letter does not […]
Assureweb has appointed ex- Woolwich managing director John Little as non-executive chairman.
With a portfolio of bonds and equities, income is more resilient in an otherwise uncertain world. To watch the video click here
- Top trends
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up
Latest from Money Marketing
Sam Seaton talks about how her interest in people affects her approach to technology