View more on these topics

Socially conscious funds don’t suffer performance penalty, analysis shows

Green-Shoots-Emerging-Growth-700.jpg

An analysis of global funds over more than a decade has found that there is no performance penalty for socially conscious products and even a slight positive skew over the period – despite a reputation to the contrary.

The Morningstar analysis for the period since 2002 ranks funds according to its star ratings, which are based on risk-adjusted performance over a period up to 10-years. The analysis is based on 25,000 observations.

While the fund universe is based on an even bell-curve distribution, the funds that self identify as socially conscious have more top-performing five-star ratings than worst-performing one-star and more four-star than two star ratings.

“It’s a slightly positive skew, but it’s also a steeper distribution,” says head of sustainability research Jon Hale.

The analysis is part of a wider paper that points out that the performance penalty associated with socially responsible funds from the 1990s has disappeared as the sector becomes more sophisticated.

Hale says the results could become more exaggerated as more funds switch to positive screening, which historically have been better at outperforming the general fund universe compared to negative screening.

Socially conscious funds vs fund universe – cumulative Morningstar ratings 2002-2016

exhibit-3-jon-hale-morningstar-report-13122016

Negative screening, whereby sin stocks are excluded, can act as a drag on performance because, in line with modern portfolio theory, it limits the investment universe on a largely non-financial basis creating a less efficient portfolio.

Hale says: “If you go back to the early 2000s, exclusion was kind of the only way you could do this, because the data and information on one company’s sustainability policies compared to their peers was at a very early stage.

“The data on company-level ESG has gotten to the point where now it makes sense. It’s usable for managers to incorporate it.”

The funds studied were largely in the equity sector, according to Hale, but also included fixed income and allocation funds. He says the trends appeared to be the same across sectors.

Chelsea Financial Services ethical analyst Ryan Lightfoot-Brown says investor feedback is prompting funds to up their game when it comes to ESG factors.

Lightfoot-Brown says funds that are “good” when it comes to environmental, social and governance factors are most likely to survive, especially as these become increasingly important to customers and stakeholders.

Furthermore, better corporate governance means they are unlikely to suffer from environmental, social or business disasters that consume resources and cause short-term falls in the share price, therefore freeing up cash to pay shareholders or improve the business.

Lightfoot-Brown says the Rathbone Ethical Bond fund invests in quality investment grade bonds and has a higher income target than most of its peers.

This is despite the fact it does not invest in around one third of the index due to its rejection of mining, arms, gambling, pornography, animal testing, nuclear power, alcohol or tobacco companies.

The fund, managed by Bryn Jones, has returned -1.3 per cent in the last three months compared to -2.6 per cent for the IA Sterling Corporate Bond sector, according to FE data. Over a three year period it has returned 19.8 per cent compared to 17.4 per cent in the sector.

Lightfoot-Brown also likes the EdenTree Amity UK and Standard Life Investments UK Ethical funds.

Recommended

UK-Currency-Money-Coins-700.jpg

Columbia Threadneedle launches UK ethical fund

Columbia Threadneedle Investments has launched a UK ethical fund. The launch of the Threadneedle Ethical UK Equity fund follows the launch of the Threadneedle UK Social Bond fund, which came to market in early 2014. Run by UK equities manager Matt Evans, the Ethical UK Equity fund targets a total return from investing in stocks screened […]

Wind-Green-Environment-Ecology-Windmill-700.jpg
1

Morningstar to create ethical fund rankings

Morningstar plans to launch ranks of funds by their level of environmental, social and governance (ESG), using data on each fund’s underlying holdings. The research firm will enveil the ESG rankings later in the year in a bid to enable investors and advisers to better understand how ethical each fund is. Using stock-specific research from Sustainalytics, […]

21

Nic Cicutti: Martin Bamford is missing the point on charges debate

Many years ago, I allowed myself to be lured temporarily from a career in journalism to a more uncertain but far more lucrative opportunity in the world of internet-based financial services. It soon became clear my bosses had a penchant for putting every idea out to be tested by all manner of focus groups. The […]

US equities: opportunities for short sellers expand

Optimism is as American as baseball and apple pie. And since the financial crisis, being optimistic about US equities has paid off: they have outperformed every other major developed market by a comfortable margin. Yet while there remain plenty of good reasons to be optimistic about US equities, Stephen Moore, manager of the Artemis US […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. No performance penalty. Is that what they call damning with faint praise?

    Sin stocks have done rather better than ‘no performance penalty’. Over the last 10 years to date. Raytheon (Defence, missiles etc.) has put on 185.4%. Even BaE has made 60%. Paddy Power (gambling) has produced a magnificent 656.4% and In Bev (booze) will have given you 224.1%. (Just for example)

    Socially conscious investments may make some feel good but sin stocks (and unfettered investing) makes you money (the purpose of investing?). I know which I prefer.

  2. This is great news, as Socially Responsible and Ethical Investment, and Principles Based Funds have been wrongfully labelled as less profitable, when indeed the out perform the index most of the time.
    David Kathman, analyst with Morningstar, summed it up by saying, “There will be times when a social screening will hurt you and times when it will help you, but over time it doesn’t make a difference.”
    Anthony Badaloo dipPFS FCPA is Principle at Barnet Based Church Hill Finance http://www.church-hill.net

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com