View more on these topics

Slipping through the net

With just over six months to go, the RDR is – quite rightly – at the forefront of everyone’s minds.

But as the deadline nears, I am looking at what the adviser land- scape may look like after December 3 and what part the networks will – or won’t – play in a post-RDR world. A few murmurs suggest some people are looking to leave networks and advisers are starting to ask questions about what they actually do.

Let’s remind ourselves why advisers were drawn to networks in the first place. The simple answer is regulatory protection and an upgrade on commissions. An IFA recommending a pension would typically get a commission of 130 per cent through Lautro. This could rise to 140-150 per cent through the network, with the upgrade of commission covering most of the cost of being in a network.

Historically an IFA who joined a network did so with the perception of regulatory protection. Yet if the FSA turns its attention to networks for particular scrutiny, IFAs will realise how little the network can give them.

The world post-RDR will be a different place. All investment advice will be fee-based with the customer agreeing the remuneration before advice is given. And no commission means no commission upgrade from networks.

There’s also the issue of complaints. When you belong to a network, the handling of the complaint is outside the control of the adviser – who simply foots the bill.

But the main reason I fear for the future of networks after the RDR is the regulator’s demand for consistent advice across the board. Networks are made up of vastly different individuals, each with their own style and system. I can’t see how consistency can be achieved, and I’m sure the regulator will be asking the same questions.

Following the RDR, I believe the FSA will turn its attention to networks and how they run their systems and financing. And I think networks will be extremely vulnerable to robust regulatory attention due to their historic advice liabilities.

Is the relevancy of networks still there post-RDR? I fear not. I do not believe they will have a place in the world the FSA is trying to create – one centred on transparency and consistency.

I think advisers should head towards being directly authorised using support companies or established firms where they will feel safe.

Sheriar Bradbury is managing director of Bradbury Hamilton



Govt urges providers to develop ‘affordable’ guaranteed products

Pensions minister Steve Webb will today urge providers to develop pension products with “affordable” guarantees as the Government attempts to reinvigorate occupational saving. In April this year, Webb (pictured) set out his vision for “defined ambition” occupational schemes. The minister said he wants to encourage employers to share some of the risks and uncertainties of […]


Large firms line up to offer home to ex-Honister advisers

Large distribution firms are lining up to offer ex-Honister advisers a route back into the industry following this week’s administration. Honister entered administration on Tuesday leaving around 900 advisers unable to trade and with a wait of up to six months to gain reauthorisation. Advisers expressed their anger on the Money Marketing site earlier this […]

FSA clampdown on distribution deals

The FSA has signalled it is looking to clamp down on some distribution deals being agreed in the lead-up to the RDR. Speaking at the Capita Financial Software Great British Adviser Day conference in London last week, FSA technical specialist Rory Percival said advisers should “exercise extreme caution” in agreeing distribution deals. He said: “I […]


SRA proposes relaxation of rules on IFA referrals

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has proposed plans to relax rules which currently force solicitors to refer clients to IFAs for investment advice. In a consultation paper released today, the SRA says the use of the term “independent intermediary” is confusing and suggests amending it to allow solicitors to recommend IFAs or restricted advisers as long […]

Sticking to valuation discipline when investing in China

Journalist Alexis Xydias discusses the opportunities – and potential pitfalls – of investing in China with Artemis fund manager Peter Saacke. With Peter holding significant positions in China in the Artemis funds he manages, journalist Alexis Xydias quizzes Peter on the risks of investing in Chinese stocks – including over-valuations, margin trading and financial reporting issues. Click here for video


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm