View more on these topics

SJP system failure leaves clients stranded


Problems with the back office system at St James’s Place mean clients are being prevented from transferring away from the wealth manager.

The issues with the back office system mean clients are unable to access written information on their investments and are facing severe delays to withdraw cash.

The problems relate specifically to its new back office system, called Blue Door, which it installed last October.

The system outage means written information on client Isa and unit trust holdings cannot be sent to investors.

Advisers report that the written information can only be sent to an SJP email address and not distributed more broadly.

Another adviser has reported waits of up to 45 days before SJP will reply to queries for client information.

In particular the tech failure is stopping clients moving away from SJP. Those clients with letters of authority from a new adviser are being prevented from accessing their investment holdings information, meaning new financial plans cannot be drawn up.

Advisers are also reporting waits of up to five weeks for cash to be transferred from client SJP accounts.

Plan Money director Peter Chadborn says: “No adviser is going to feel comfortable formulating any advice if they are not 100 per cent confident in the accuracy of the information they are basing their advice on. It puts non-SJP advisers and SJP clients in a very difficult position where clients may be seeking a second opinion but can’t get one until this problem is fixed.”

Informed Choice executive director Nick Bamford says he has experienced delays in transferring clients from SJP.

He says: “It is frustrating if you are dealing with clients with a letter of authority, the file on what they have got invested sits around for six weeks before we can do accurate reporting for the client.

“I don’t think bigger organisations really fully understand that it impacts the delivery of service to the client when the process of moving paper from one place to another takes so long.”

SJP declined to comment on the specific faults with the system, but says it is working on the problems.

In a statement, SJP says: “At the end of October we upgraded some of our back office systems with a view to improving our service delivery.

“Unfortunately, in the short term there have been some bedding-in issues causing delays in some aspects of our service. We sincerely apologise to any clients impacted by these issues and would like to assure them that they are temporary.”

However, SJP was not able to state when the problem will be fixed.

SJP decided to consolidate its back office system last year, from a number of providers into one supplier, IFDS.

IFDS declined to comment, saying it is company policy not to speak about client affairs.



SJP assets hit £55bn as net pension inflows rise 44%

St James’s Place saw total assets under management hit £54.5bn at the end of the third quarter as more than £620m of new pension money flowed to the wealth manager. The firm’s third quarter update, published this morning, reveals gross inflows of funds under management were £2.32bn in the three months to 30 September, up […]


Does SJP have a fee transparency problem?

Advisers have criticised St James’s Place for its “secretive” approach to fee disclosure after an investigation by The Sunday Times. The Sunday Times has attempted to shine a light on SJP’s charging structure after readers voiced concerns that its advice charges were not transparent. The newspaper featured a story last month looking at indicative costs […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 10 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. You get what you pay for!

  2. Yeah…..that’s convenient!!

  3. We sincerely apologise to any clients impacted by these issues and would like to assure them that they are temporary.”

    Brilliant! Finally acknowledging they can’t hope to retain clients.

  4. ‘SJP was not able to state when the problem will be fixed..’

    Given the awesome effectiveness of the FCA the answer is likely to be never. If they can get away with it, why not, it sure helps to keep the assets under management figures robust.

  5. Systems and controls failures.

    What fines do banks get if their ATM network is out for a day?

    Wonder if anything similar will be levied by FCA

  6. Not surprising bearing in mind they are using IFDS. Standard Life Investments have had problems since they started using them, or rather I did, SLI did not seem to want to acknowledge there is a problem. Just steer clear of any investment companies who use IFDS.

  7. Seems SJP are not quite as good as the hype.

  8. Now now please don’t berate SJP for system failures they have been failng unknowing clients for years – FCA TAKE NOTE. It highlights that the advisers/salespeople have no sway and have to do what ‘big brother’ SJP tell them to do. They are NOT SJP employees, they are RESTRICTED advisers usually LOCKED IN TO AN SJP CONTRACT with a Golden Handshake. Although I do have to say that their Marketing is 1st class, a bit like VW!

  9. I bet their back office system doesn”t have a problem processing assets or cash coming into SJP !!!!!

  10. I have had a good insight into their internal IT, and it is not good!
    Very superficial!

Leave a comment