View more on these topics

Sipp provider faces uncertain future as more complaints come in

Sipp provider Carey Pensions has been accused of due diligence failings over an unregulated investment firm in the latest in a string of Financial Ombudsman Service complaints.

Carey posted a loss of £153,800 in 2016 due to an increase in claims. The firm said the loss was due to “a number of complaints and legal cases relating to some historic business which is now being run down” and says these “relate to investments into Sipp made on an execution only basis in the period 2011-13”.

In a FOS decision seen by Money Marketing, the business is criticised for taking a “piecemeal approach” to due diligence in its dealings with unregulated Spanish business Commercial Land and Property Brokers.

The FOS says if Carey had carried out appropriate due diligence at the start of its dealings with the firm, it would have discovered its director Terence Wright was on the regulator’s “persons to avoid” list.

The complaint investigated by the FOS found that Carey had raised concerns that Commercial Land was offering consumers cash incentives for transferring their pensions twice before terminating its agreement to do business with the firm.

One consumer, who was cold-called by Commercial Land, transferred their pension cash value into a Sipp, which was then invested in unregulated investments after being “promised big returns”.

These were Storefirst, a UK self-storage unit facility, and Gas Verdant, which offered returns from plots of farmland in Australia.

Carey said it could not be responsible for the decision to transfer the pension because it is was made on an execution-only basis and it not permitted to provide advice.

The firm, which set up an agreement with Commercial Land in August 2011, carried out due diligence including a background check on two of the firm’s representatives; speaking to the firm in December 2011 about the high portion of business it had introduced which related to the transfer of final salary schemes and the payment of “cash back” incentives; and asking for a copy of its accounts and passports of the directors in March and April 2012.

The FOS says that while Carey did carry out “significant” due diligence, it took a “piecemeal approach”, accepting business from Commercial Land in the meantime.

It says: “[Carey] should have done all of these things before accepting business from Commercial Land. I believe if it had carried out the above actions at the outset, it should have concluded it shouldn’t accept business from Commercial Land.”

It adds that had the firm carried out due diligence, it would have seen an FSA warning about Commercial Land director Terence Wright. In October 2010, the regulator published a warning about Wright that he had been providing financial services or products in the UK without authorisation.

The FSA said he was “not authorised by us but has been targeting people in the UK.”

Carey terminated its agreement with Commercial Land in May 2012, ten days after it conducted a background check on Terence Wright.



Consumers say lack of advice stops them saving

Consumers think they would be saving £134 a month more if they had financial advice, survey of over 1,000 people has found. The Nottingham Building Society commissioned research shows that 21 per cent of adults say they aren’t saving as much as they could without advice, and are losing out on around £1,600 a year […]


Aberdeen Standard Investments closes Absolute Return Government Bond fund

Aberdeen Standard Investments is closing the Absolute Return Government Bond fund it acquired from Ignis. The Ignis Absolute Return Government Bond fund transferred to Standard Life Investments following the firm’s acquisition of Ignis Asset Management in 2014. The £149m fund has now been closed to further investment and will be wound up on 22 December […]

Aviva boosts growth targets eyeing ‘bolt-on’ acquisitions

Aviva has boosted expectations of how fast it expects to grow its earnings and cash reserves, hinting at further acquisitions as it pays off debt. At an event for investors today, Aviva says it expects to be able to pay out greater dividends to shareholders as the business has become “streamlined” and “focused on markets […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. If you say “execution only” to FOS it will be taken not as a defence but an instruction as to what you want them to do with you.

  2. sets out the range of investments permitted via James Hay’s SIPP. Any SIPP provider not using a similar list, and refusing point blank to accommodate anything outside it, is all but inviting trouble further down the line.

    Why, as a SIPP provider, would you want to get involved with anyone who’s been conned into believing that they can somehow defy the laws of economic gravity by investing in wildly off-piste direct investments, particularly overseas ones?

Leave a comment