View more on these topics

Single signals

Many partners are being left high and dry without a joint-life annuity.

The goal of a simplified pension system is a worthwhile one but when it comes to protected rights, simplification for its own sake can lead to the baby, or more accurately the old widow, being thrown out with the bath water.

Last week, the Government was criticised by some in the industry for inserting an amendment into the 2007 Pensions Bill that will require spouses and civil partners to buy a joint-life annuity with their protected rights fund, even after contracting out has been abolished in 2012.

The arguments that the admin costs will be greater for two pots rather than one may hold true for life offices but it will not make any difference to the income that the retirees receive, nor will it affect their access to advice.

Many annuity specialists recommend getting more than one type of annuity and the adviser’s commission is determined by the aggregate value of all of the products bought.

What seems like a technical argument for the industry is in fact a serious social issue for many thousands of elderly widows (and some widowers) and a serious policy issue for Government.

The poorest sector of our society is very elderly women and this situation has been compounded by the reality that the vast majority of married people buying annuities, usually men, do not opt for a joint-life annuity with their personal pension fund.

It surely follows, that to remove the requirement to provide for your better half from protected rights funds will only serve to erode widows’ pensions, not improve them.

Age Concern has described this failure to look after spouses as the “selfishness of men” and statistically it is men who are more likely to have built up pensions and are therefore the ones facing the decision.

That is not to say that as many women as men opt for a single-life annuity where they are the ones buying the annuity. But the figures for the number of spouses to be left short-changed once their partner departs this world are quite staggering. Figures from Standard Life released a year ago showed that threequarters of their married annuity customers had bought single life annuities.

I find this an astonishing state of affairs and I cannot believe that three-quarters of retired married couples have sat down and discussed this. I would imagine there are millions of people, mostly women, who are in for a nasty financial surprise following a bereavement.

This is a situation where I have personal knowledge. My aunt, now 90, still talks fondly of her husband, who died of lung cancer 18 months after 30 soot-filled years down a coal mine. But 35 years later, it still hurts her when she reflects that he opted for a higher pension income for the 18 months that he was alive rather than provide anything for her.

Thirty-five years of spouse’s pension exchanged for 18 months’ higher income does not seem like a great deal.

Part of the problem is that people want the highest annuity they can get, which is why so many people go for level annuities rather than index-linked ones. It is human nature to want something now and deal with the future later. Only yesterday, I idly put my lamentable retirement savings plans through a pension calculator and had to stop myself from opting for an annuity that would do nothing to protect my wife, or myself against inflation.

I strongly believe more needs to be done to make sure the issue of survivor benefits is addressed by both parties in a relationship. Somebody who has stayed at home to bring up children should be entitled at the very least to be consulted on whether a joint-life plan should be bought.

This would lead to more regulation but should be done as part of a long overdue overhaul of the annuity purchase process which would reduce the amount of time an adviser should spend, making annuity advice available right down to funds at the trivial commutation level.

If people want to buy an annuity that leaves their partner high and dry, that is their choice. But they should have to look their other half in the face and tell them where they stand.

John Greenwood is editor of Corporate Adviser.

Recommended

Rics finds legal loophole in Hip rules

The Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors has discovered a legal loophole in the Government’s Home Information Pack which means sellers could avoid buying a pack.Rics says the rules allow sellers to have simply ordered a pack when they exchange contracts and, if they manage to sell their home quickly, they may not have to pay […]

JP Morgan launches JPM flexible bond fund

JPMorgan Asset Management has launched a JPM Flexible Bond Fund which it claims has the flexibility to maximise returns during all market environments.JPMAM says that unlike most other European bond funds, JPM Flexible Bond Fund is able to invest in all fixed income securities in order to take advantage of the best opportunities in global […]

Warriors take funds of hedge funds by storm

Thames River Capital attributes the strong performance of its Warrior funds of hedge funds to their focus on up and coming hedge funds.Warrior 1 and 2 were the star performers in Standard & Poor’s first-quarter update of the fund of hedge funds sector, having returned 6.8 and 8.7 per cent respectively.All funds of hedge funds […]

Pound-Sterling-GBP-Money-Currency-Andrew-Michaels-700x450.jpg

Graphic content – May; UK economic data has finally turned for the worse

In June 2016, immediately before the Brexit referendum, a curious thing happened. Despite the colossal uncertainty facing the UK, economic data actually started to come in above consensus forecasts. Citi’s economic surprise index nudged into positive territory, which meant that UK economic data had on the whole outperformed consensus forecasts over the prior three months. […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com