View more on these topics

Should you vote for a euro loan?

Euro fever is in vogue again. The currency has fallen dramatically over the last year against most other currencies, including the pound, and, despite international central banks&#39 intervention, the euro still looks weak and beleaguered.

Sounds like bad news, but not if you have a euro-denominated mortgage. Last year, both Barclays and Abbey National promo-ted euro mortgages, offering variable rates at less than 5 per cent, well below the prevailing UK mortgage rates at that time.

Lucky euro mortgage-holders have seen over 25 per cent wiped off the sterling value of their mortgages over the past year – a significant windfall indeed. With euro rates still lower than in the UK and prospects of yet further falls in the euro, should we all rush out and get euro mortgages instead of sterling-denominated ones?

Our view is absolutely not, unless you have very special circumstances. If your income is paid in pounds, which is the case for the vast majority of UK citizens working and living in this country, having a euro mortgage can be very risky. If the euro rises against the pound, then not only will the sterling value of the mortgage balance increase but also the sterling value of the monthly repayments. If you are paid in pounds, such rises could be very costly, especially as a house is at risk if mortgage repayments cannot be paid.

But are euro mortgages for UK residents sensible for those who are paid in euros? While in this case, mortgage repayments as a percentage of income would be immune from euro exchange rate movements, they would still be totally dependent on euro market interest rates. Presently, these are relatively low and so there is a strong likelihood they will increase over the coming year.

Any variable-rate mortgage leaves the mortgage-payer exposed to possible interest rate rises and these can increase the burden of mortgage debt repayment dramatically, as many who lived through the early 90s will all too clearly remember. Generally, more people should seek to take out fixed-rate mortgages rather than variable mortgages, even if the fixed rate is higher than the prevailing variable rate.

One should think of any extra cost of a fixed-rate mortgage as an insurance payment that guarantees interest rates willnot go higher. Most households pay out hundreds of poundsa year on contents and house insurance without wanting tobe burgled or to have their house burn down. Similarly, households should not mind initially paying a few pounds extraa month to guarantee that mortgage rates will not becomeexorbitantly high and unaffordable.

But this begs the question, why not take out a fixed-rateeuro mortgage? This mortgage has the advantage of ensuring the debt repayments will remain constant relative to a stable euro-denominated salary. However, the total amount of debt (fixed in euros) is still free to fluctuate quite markedly relative to the value of the house (priced in pounds sterling), due to euro/pound exchange rate movements.

For example, consider a euro mortgage presently worth (in UK money) £65,000. Say this is secured against a UK property valued at £100,000 (hence the mortgage-holder has £35,000 of his or her own equity invested in the property). If the value of the euro rises 20 per cent relative to the pound, the sterling value of the mortgage will also rise by 20 per cent (to £78,000). While the relative burden of debt repayments will not change (salary is paid in euros), the sterling value of the mortgage has increased by £13,000, reducing the available equity in the house from £35,000 to £22,000 (a fall of nearly 40 per cent). If the mortgage-holder needed to sell the property quickly, the effect of this exchange rate movement would be very costly indeed.

If the euro mortgage was of a higher value relative to the value of the house (for example, equivalent to a sterling value of £90,000 against a value of a house of £100,000), then a risein the euro relative to the pound could well increase the sterling value of the euro mortgage debt to well above the value of the house. The owner would then be in “negative equity”. In this case, unless an alternative source of wealth was available to reduce the mortgage debt, such as savings, the owner would be unable to move house. His castle would turn into a prison until either UK house prices rose sufficiently or the euro/ pound exchange rate fell back again.

All this illustrates the many risks involved in taking out a euro mortgage in the UK. It is absolutely not for the faint-hearted and not that attractive for many of the brave-hearted either.

A euro mortgage would be much more appropriate for a euro-salaried individual if he or she was buying a euro-valued house. But then this house would not be in the UK but on the other side of the Channel in Euroland. For those hell-bent on euro mortgages, being over there rather than over here may well be the best place for them.

Recommended

Yorkshire sets £20m target with second tech VCT

Yorkshire Fund Mana-gers is offering its second technology venture capital trust, with the aim of raising £20m.The fund, which is one of several autumn VCT launches, will be called the British smaller technology companies VCT 2.The investment strategy will be similar to the original fund, which was set up in May last year.The new fund […]

Amnesty or amnesia for Isa chaos?

The lessons learnt from the first year of Isas could push investors towards seeking financial advice the next time around.The industry fears that many investors have unwittingly broken the Isa rules because they do not understand the difference between mini and maxi Isas.Out of a survey of 1,000 adults, over half who had heard of […]

NPI taking stakeholder on the road

NPI is embarking on a series of national roadshows designed to strengthen its presence as a stakeholder provider.The roadshows will be led by NPI managing director Trevor Thompson and parent company AMP Group group executive Damon Watkins.They will be held at 14 venues over the next few weeks. Around 1,000 IFAs are expected to attend.The […]

LTC lord warns on danger of misselling debacle

The pension misselling scandal will be repeated unless the Government introduces regulation of long-term care products, warns Labour Lord David Lipsey.Lipsey, a member of the royal commission on LTC, was speaking at a Labour conference fringe meeting discussing who should pay for LTC costs.He says, because of the complex nature of LTC products and the […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment