View more on these topics

Set your sites on IHT reduction

Over the past few weeks, I have been considering whether offshore trusts

offer any advantages to the UK taxpayer over the homegrown version.

After looking at this issue in connection with capital gains tax,

especially in light of the anti-avoidance provisions in this year&#39s Budget,

I will turn to the issue of inheritance tax.

When it comes to looking at offshore trusts in connection with inheritance

tax, it must be noted that if a settlor is non-UK domiciled at the time he

makes a transfer of property into the trust, regardless of the residence of

the trust, then, provided the trust property is non-UK-situs property, it

will forever be excluded property.

So, from an IHT standpoint, the non-UK-resident status of the trustees

does not help the non-UK domiciliary. This is equally true for the UK

domiciled settlor.

The statutory justification for this is S48(3)(a) IHTA 1984 which provides

that, where property in a trust is situated outside the UK – but not a

reversionary interest in the property – it is excluded property unless the

settlor was domiciled in the UK at the time the settlement was made.

This means that property in the trust is not subject to IHT at any time

while it remains non-UK sited, regardless of the subsequent domicile of the

settlor.

This is clearly a very important consideration as it confers a permanent

exemption from IHT irrespective of the subsequent history of the trust,

provided the property itself is situated outside the UK.

S44(1) IHTA 1984 provides a wide definition of settlor to include “any

person by whom the settlement was made directly or indirectly and in

particular (but without prejudice to the generality of the preceding words)

includes any person who has provided funds directly or indirectly for the

purpose of or in connection with the settlement or has made with any other

person a reciprocal arrangement for that other person to make the

settlement”.

Where this definition produces more than one settlor, the part provided by

each can be treated as a separate trust. This will catch arrangements where

there is a dummy settlor and, subsequently, other property finds its way

into the trust.

The situs of property is a question governed by private international law.

Despite this, in most cases, the situs of the property will be obvious.

Company shares are sited where the register is kept and life insurance

policies, being debts, are sited where the life company is resident or, if

the policy is issued under seal, where the policy is physically situated.

Reversionary interests are usually excluded property. Reversionary

interests are defined under S47 IHTA 1984 as “future interests under a

settlement, whether vested or contingent”.

If a reversionary interest is not already excluded property under the

general rule of S48(1) IHTA 1984, it may still be excluded property if the

person beneficially entitled to it is an individual domiciled outside the

UK.

Reversionary interests in settled property situated outside the UK are

prevented from being excluded property under S48(3)(a) IHTA 1984 but are

brought back in as excluded property by S48(3)(b) IHTA 1984, which provides

that S6(1) IHTA 1984 applies to a reversionary interest in the property but

does not otherwise apply in relation to the property.

S6(1) provides that property situated outside the UK is excluded property

if the person beneficially entitled to it is an individual domiciled

outside the UK. Therefore, for a reversionary interest in foreign property

to be excluded property, the individual reversioner must be domiciled

outside the UK.

S218 IHTA 1984 imposes a liability on any person, other than a barrister,

who has been concerned with the making of a trust in the course of his

trade or profession and knows or has reason to believe that the settlor was

domiciled in the UK and that the trustees are not or will not be resident

in the UK, to report this to the Inland Revenue within three months of the

creation of the trust with the names and addresses of the settlor and

trustees.

For the purposes of the provision, trustees of a settlement are regarded

as not resident in the UK unless the general administration of the

settlement is ordinarily carried on in the UK and the trustees or a

majority of them (and, where there is more than one class of trustees, a

majority of each class) are for the time being resident in the UK.

Failure to comply carries a penalty of £300 plus £60 per day if it

continues after it has been declared by a court or the Special

Commissioners. A reasonable excuse defence is provided in S245A(5) IHTA

1984.

The requirement to provide information in this way is important in

alerting the Revenue to the existence of such trusts. It does not apply to

will trusts or to a trust where an account has been delivered to the

Revenue under S216 IHTA 1984.

Recommended

97 Royal London staff axed over new pay deal

Home-service life office Royal London has sacked 97 of its salesforce forrefusing to sign new contracts replacing commission payments withperformance-related pay.The company told its salesforce to agree to the contracts or it wouldterminate their relationship in a bid to wean staff off commission.Basic pay has been increased from £11,000 to £17,000 and a system ofvariable […]

How green was my philosophy?

The ethical investment card is being pushed under the noses of IFAs as thewinds of political correctness hit the financial services industry.In July, legislation is being brought in that will force pension fundtrustees to declare their stance on ethical investment.Trustees are in the process of reviewing their statement of best practice.The move is not intended […]

Abbey set to recruit 100 staff in blitz on pensions

Abbey National is poised to blitz the stakeholder market as it recruits anationwide salesforce of 100 “stakeholder managers”.The company says it is acting in response to other lenders shunning thestakeholder market, believing it will be unprofitable.Abbey says it is planning to “punch the weight” of its brand in thepension market and has already started bringing […]

FSA says no need for panic as legislation is put back

Legislation underpinning the FSA will not come fully into force until 2001because the regulator needs more time to define its day-to-day role, saysthe Treasury.The Government and the FSA say the recent huge raft of amendments tabled bythe Conservatives in the House of Lords is not to blame for the delay.The process will take longer because […]

Guarantees in the retirement income market

Lorna Blyth, Royal London  Do guarantees benefit customers and, if so, when? To answer this conundrum we commissioned Millimans, a global actuarial consulting firm, to conduct an independent review of the UK retirement income market and whether guarantees really do offer customers better value for money. The brief The study was one of the most comprehensive undertaken […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment