View more on these topics

Set your sites on IHT reduction

Over the past few weeks, I have been considering whether offshore trusts


offer any advantages to the UK taxpayer over the homegrown version.


After looking at this issue in connection with capital gains tax,


especially in light of the anti-avoidance provisions in this year&#39s Budget,


I will turn to the issue of inheritance tax.


When it comes to looking at offshore trusts in connection with inheritance


tax, it must be noted that if a settlor is non-UK domiciled at the time he


makes a transfer of property into the trust, regardless of the residence of


the trust, then, provided the trust property is non-UK-situs property, it


will forever be excluded property.


So, from an IHT standpoint, the non-UK-resident status of the trustees


does not help the non-UK domiciliary. This is equally true for the UK


domiciled settlor.


The statutory justification for this is S48(3)(a) IHTA 1984 which provides


that, where property in a trust is situated outside the UK – but not a


reversionary interest in the property – it is excluded property unless the


settlor was domiciled in the UK at the time the settlement was made.


This means that property in the trust is not subject to IHT at any time


while it remains non-UK sited, regardless of the subsequent domicile of the


settlor.


This is clearly a very important consideration as it confers a permanent


exemption from IHT irrespective of the subsequent history of the trust,


provided the property itself is situated outside the UK.


S44(1) IHTA 1984 provides a wide definition of settlor to include “any


person by whom the settlement was made directly or indirectly and in


particular (but without prejudice to the generality of the preceding words)


includes any person who has provided funds directly or indirectly for the


purpose of or in connection with the settlement or has made with any other


person a reciprocal arrangement for that other person to make the


settlement”.


Where this definition produces more than one settlor, the part provided by


each can be treated as a separate trust. This will catch arrangements where


there is a dummy settlor and, subsequently, other property finds its way


into the trust.


The situs of property is a question governed by private international law.


Despite this, in most cases, the situs of the property will be obvious.


Company shares are sited where the register is kept and life insurance


policies, being debts, are sited where the life company is resident or, if


the policy is issued under seal, where the policy is physically situated.


Reversionary interests are usually excluded property. Reversionary


interests are defined under S47 IHTA 1984 as “future interests under a


settlement, whether vested or contingent”.


If a reversionary interest is not already excluded property under the


general rule of S48(1) IHTA 1984, it may still be excluded property if the


person beneficially entitled to it is an individual domiciled outside the


UK.


Reversionary interests in settled property situated outside the UK are


prevented from being excluded property under S48(3)(a) IHTA 1984 but are


brought back in as excluded property by S48(3)(b) IHTA 1984, which provides


that S6(1) IHTA 1984 applies to a reversionary interest in the property but


does not otherwise apply in relation to the property.


S6(1) provides that property situated outside the UK is excluded property


if the person beneficially entitled to it is an individual domiciled


outside the UK. Therefore, for a reversionary interest in foreign property


to be excluded property, the individual reversioner must be domiciled


outside the UK.


S218 IHTA 1984 imposes a liability on any person, other than a barrister,


who has been concerned with the making of a trust in the course of his


trade or profession and knows or has reason to believe that the settlor was


domiciled in the UK and that the trustees are not or will not be resident


in the UK, to report this to the Inland Revenue within three months of the


creation of the trust with the names and addresses of the settlor and


trustees.


For the purposes of the provision, trustees of a settlement are regarded


as not resident in the UK unless the general administration of the


settlement is ordinarily carried on in the UK and the trustees or a


majority of them (and, where there is more than one class of trustees, a


majority of each class) are for the time being resident in the UK.


Failure to comply carries a penalty of £300 plus £60 per day if it


continues after it has been declared by a court or the Special


Commissioners. A reasonable excuse defence is provided in S245A(5) IHTA


1984.


The requirement to provide information in this way is important in


alerting the Revenue to the existence of such trusts. It does not apply to


will trusts or to a trust where an account has been delivered to the


Revenue under S216 IHTA 1984.

Recommended

Keep the Standard flying as a mutual

Mutuality works for Standard Life. For the last 75 years it has been thecompany&#39s abiding principle and is the underlying reason for its positionas one of the UK&#39s leading life and pensions providers. And there is noreason why mutuality would not continue to work for Standard Life long intothe future.Sadly, enormous pressure is being applied […]

Mortgage merger poses difficult questions for Mr Choice

No decision has been taken on how the combined salesforce of Bradford &Bingley IFA and mortgage specialist John Charcol will operate, according toCharcol&#39s new commercial director, Ian Darby.Having been selected for the post above axed Charcol chief executive KeithScott, Darby says details on how the branding, administration and paystructures of the 650-strong salesforce will operate […]

Investment view

Never underestimate the importance of a single word. In this case, theword is “temporarily”. Last week, I made reference to the fact that thedownward spiral in technology shares had abated, perhaps temporarily. Theaddition of “briefly” would have made this statement accurate. Bargainhunters did step in to snap up what they perceived as promising companiesat rock-bottom […]

Warning as IFAs push for more commission

IFAs could be shooting themselves in the foot with demands for ever highercommission, claims Andersen Consulting.The claims come as IFA network Countrywide and national IFA Towry Law aredemanding that life offices pay them more commission.Countrywide&#39s owner Misys is also believed to be flexing its collectivemuscle after bringing together four networks to hammer out a futurebusiness […]

Time to stop the salami slicing on tax relief

Steve Webb  – Director of Policy and External Communications As the Autumn Statement approaches, Steve Webb calls for the Government to stop tinkering with tax relief. Twice a year, in the run-up to the Spring Budget and the Autumn Statement, we face a torrent of speculation as to what changes the Chancellor might make to […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment