View more on these topics

Selectapension set to restart DB transfers next year

Major defined benefit transfer provider Selectapension Bureau Services has said it should be able to resume business for new clients early next year after being caught up in the regulator’s review of the market.

SBS suspended its DB pension transfer business in June after the FCA audited of its outsourced advice firm CFPML.

SBS can still handle report writing and transfer value calculation services for pension transfer analysis, but cannot execute advice without CFPML.

An SBS spokeswoman tells Money Marketing: “Our partner CFPML has made good progress to meet the FCA’s requirements, following their visit in June, and are well on track to complete this work by the end of October. They should therefore be in a position to process those cases which await recommendations from early November.

“All advisers who have introduced cases have been contacted to establish whether they wish to continue with CFPML or to withdraw these, with no charge, and proceed with a new advice firm.

“We will prioritise the existing pipeline cases and are therefore unlikely to accept any new cases until the beginning of 2018.”

However, a note on the SBS website from 26 June that the firm cannot accept new TVAS cases remain in place.

Intelligent Pensions, another significant player in the IFA market as a specialist in pension transfer advice, agreed with the FCA on 7 June to suspend DB transfer services.

Intelligent Pensions technical director Fiona Tait says that the firm is “still in negotiations with the FCA” and could not provide an update until these are finished.

Other advice firms visited by the FCA also remain closed to new transfer business. A note on the website of Kent-based Heather Dunne IFA, for example, remains unchanged from last month. It reads: “HDIFA is not currently taking on new cases while we revise our terms and processes. We will be updating all existing introducers once these changes have been completed.”

The FCA is continuing to review the DB transfer market. It recently released results of its suitability assessments at the firms it investigated.

Of 88 transfers that were advised to go ahead, it found only 47 per cent were suitable. In 36 per cent of cases, suitability was unclear, while 17 per cent were ruled unsuitable.

Separately, it assessed the suitability of the product and fund the customer ended up in. Only 35 per cent of these were suitable. 24 per cent were unsuitable, and 40 per cent were unclear.

Recommended

Spotlight on charges 700x450.jpg
10

Head to head: Should advisers or clients pay for platforms?

As Money Marketing explores new research on who benefits from platforms, two leading lights go head to head on the issue of who should pay: advisers, or clients? Clients should pay We view platforms as being just another product in the advice process, much like investments and tax wrappers. The upshot is that in practice […]

Health services

Challenges and opportunities

By Sarah Scott, marketing consultant On 22 February this year the charity Diabetes UK launched a fundraising initiative, #Swim22. They challenged individuals to swim 22 miles over the course of 89 days – a distance that equates to the width of the English Channel. Because of the time period the challenge is spread over, it […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Please stop repeating misleading statistics, unclear does not mean unsuitable.

Leave a comment