View more on these topics

ScotWids chief hits out at political failure over long-term care

Toby Strauss, Scottish Widows

Scottish Widows chief executive Toby Strauss has warned politicians are failing to engage with the need to link the cost of long-term care with the new pensions flexibilities.

Speaking at the launch of Scottish Widows’ retirement report in London this week, Strauss said he had sought to convince MPs of the need to assess the impact of pension freedoms on long-term care costs, but there was an unwillingness to address this.

He said: “Post-Dilnot we were very active participants in some work with the Government in how we look at how these things interact and I was very disappointed that didn’t get some traction.

“I remember suggesting that Steve Webb should have been pensions and long-term care minister, but he didn’t find that very appealing.

“There is no political will at all at the moment to deal with it. Politicians see that there’s no mileage in it at the moment, but when the Daily Mail start writing about it, then they will surely focus on it.  It is very disappointing that we’re not able to get on the front foot.”

Strauss’ comments come as a report from the think-tank International Longevity Centre warns of the risk of pensions savers deliberately spending savings in order to qualify for means-tested benefits on long-term care.

In a Department of Work and Pensions note issued in March, the government warned it will look dimly on savers deemed to have deliberately deprived themselves of money to qualify.

The DWP said:“If it is decided that you have deliberately deprived yourself, you will be treated as still having that money and it will be taken into account as income or capital when your benefit entitlement is worked out.”

Bu the ILC says there remains little clarity over how deliberate deprivation will be defined, and if those definitions will remain in the long term.

The report adds: “Without some degree of certainty on this point, it risks people sleepwalking into decisions that will seriously affects their benefits at some future point in time.”

Recommended

2

Dilnot reforms fail to spark long-term care market

A lack of demand and regulatory uncertainty is killing off the insurance industry’s appetite to create long-term care products, providers warn. Just a year ago the Association British Insurers and the Government agreed a statement of intent pledging to boost awareness of care issues and encourage insurers to launch products to help people meet the […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Come on Ros, surely you will hold firm on this one. (Even if it comes out of the mouth of an insurance chief.)
    Any champion of older peoples’ rights knows paying for long-term care was a problem before pension freedoms. Now it can only a bigger problem for some, if the reason they cashed in is they were desperate for the money (or worse some scamster was…). And the prospect of cashing in annuities too magnifies the problem still further.
    I cling to hope that Ros is up for this part of the challenge, encouraged by her blogs
    on 20 Jan “Policymakers must wake up to the care crisis”
    http://www.rosaltmann.com/care-crisis-release-20-01-15.html
    and 2 Feb “Let’s have new tax incentives for care saving ”
    http://www.rosaltmann.com/Care-saving-ISA-2-Feb-15.html

    I don’t know if the Baroness and the Widows boss agree on solution, but they seem to agree on the problem and its urgency.

  2. Julian Stevens 26th June 2015 at 4:40 pm

    25 minutes on hold today waiting to talk to someone at Scottish Widows on a very simple matter. Useless.

Leave a comment