View more on these topics

Rule shake-up to cost 10 times FSA estimate

The FSA’s proposed changes to disclosure rules for pensions and adviser-charging will cost the industry £200m rather than the £20m estimated by the regulator, according to Finance & Technology Research Centre director Ian McKenna.

McKenna says the FSA’s estimate demonstrates a “woeful lack of understanding” of the costs of system implementation.

Earlier this month, a consultation from the regulator proposed changes to product disclosure arising from RDR adviser and consultancy charging and new Sipp disclosure rules.

McKenna says introducing systems for the reforms would cost the industry £200m. He says: “The FSA has either not done its homework properly or it has missed a zero off the end of the numbers. The amount of work needed to change systems is significant, especially the requirement to show the impact of adviser charges on the reduction in yield.

“The £20m figure suggests a woeful lack of understanding of the cost of system implementation and changes. This is going to make it very, very difficult for a lot of small Sipp providers.”

Standard Life head of pensions policy John Lawson said earlier this month the proposals, if implemented, would put half of Sipp administrators out of business. He said: “We are talking about costs in the millions of pounds to build a system which can do this. Any Sipp administrator that is not an insurer will be thinking this is going to be horrendous.”

An FSA spokesman says: “As with any consultation, the FSA is inviting individuals and firms to contact us and give us their feedback.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. An industry disappearing up its own backside led by the regulator. Another reason for the Labour government to hang its head in shame.

  2. Just yet another hopeless underestimation of cost. When was the last time they got anything right? I notice Skandia have just increased their annual fee by 31%, not for any greater benefit to the customer but to pay for increased pension legislation and other regulatory burden. When will these ‘jokers’ on their unaccountable PAYE DB gravy train get anything right? I suspect that they are too arrogant to even care.

  3. No surprise then about missing a 0 off!

    Is this a true consultation, or simply window dressing as the FSA mind (if it has one) is already made up?

  4. So where’s the FSA’s Cost:Benefits Analysis? Not that it’d make any difference ~ the FSA has decided that this is what the industry is goig to have to do and to hell with what it’ll cost. After all, the costs are always borne by everybody else.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm