View more on these topics

Royal London: ‘Flexible retirement is an illusion’

Steve-Webb-in-2014-700.jpg

Royal London has argued the idea of a “flexible” retirement with a gradual reduction in working hours is unachievable unless increases in pension saving are accelerated.

Research by the provider suggests based on current contribution levels, employees may have to work into their seventies or eighties to provide a comfortable retirement.

Its analysis is based on individuals who save into a pension at the legal minimum and draw a state pension and reduce their hours to part-time as soon as they are able.

Royal London found those targeting a “gold standard” retirement, where retirement income is two-thirds of pre-retirement levels, would have to work until they are 79 before they can afford to retire, compared to a retirement age of 74 for someone who defers their state pensions and maintains full-time hours.

For those targeting a “silver standard” retirement, where income is half pre-retirement levels, they would have to work until age 69 if they chose to retire gradually.

For pensions linked to inflation or offered on a joint basis, the retirement age could climb into the eighties.

But Royal London says increasing the contribution rate from the minimum 8 per cent to 10 per cent would bring forward retirement ages by three years, and every 1 per cent increase in contributions would shave off a year of a person’s working life.

Royal London director of policy Steve Webb says: “A flexible retirement, where we can gradually reduce our hours and stop work at an acceptable age, is likely to be a mirage for millions of people based on current levels of saving.

“The good news is there is an antidote to excessive working lives and this is higher rates of pension contributions.  We find that each 1 per cent on pension contribution rates takes at least one year off the number of years for which you have to work to achieve a decent retirement.

“These findings need to be considered carefully by the Government as it reviews the rules around automatic enrolment in 2017.”

Recommended

5

Govt names the pensions experts leading auto-enrol review

Standard Life pensions strategy head Jamie Jenkins has been appointed one of three chairs of the advisory group for the Government’s auto-enrolment review. The Department for Work and Pensions today published the terms of reference for the group and its members. Jenkins is the chair responsible for reviewing the coverage of auto-enrolment, The People’s Pension […]

Pensions-savings-retirement-piggy bank

Royal London eyes guaranteed drawdown launch

Royal London has hinted that it could make a play in the guaranteed drawdown market. There are currently only three providers offering guaranteed drawdown products – often referred to as unit-linked guarantees which combine drawdown with assured levels of income – in the UK: Aegon, MetLife and Prudential. Speaking to Money Marketing, Royal London pension specialist […]

Harris Associates' view on the UK’s vote to leave the EU

By David Herro, Partner, Deputy Chairman, Portfolio Manager and Chief Investment Officer of International Equity at Harris Associates Britain’s vote to exit the European Union has led to significant uncertainty across global markets. We believe market impact of this uncertainty, though severe, is more of a shorter-term phenomenon which will provide an opportunity for long-term […]

State of the markets: global growth

In conversation with journalist Alexis Xydias, Artemis Global Growth Fund manager Peter Saacke discusses the state of global markets and how he is positioning his fund. Peter gives his views on the growth potential of US, Europe and emerging markets, each of which is on a different stage of the road to recovery. And with a […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Soft retirement is an illusion for more impelling reasons than pensions. Few employers will take kindly to desultory workers. Even the self-employed would find it difficult to work less yet make enough to cover expenses and retain a proper grip on the business.

    But then Mr Web has a blinkered view restricted to his employers interests rather than the real world.

  2. Forgive me if I’m wrong but isn’t retirement income based upon a client’s planned expenditure nor what they were earning during work?
    Gold standard and Silver retirement sounds a bit gimmicky but the sentiment is fair. People need to save more!

  3. I wouldn’t take any advice from a company like Royal London
    For investors in their offshore bonds they will be far better off saving money in a zero interest bank account than pay their charges.

Leave a comment