View more on these topics

Royal London chief: Pension cap will hit small employers and their staff


The DWP has accepted that small employers will face a limited choice of providers under its proposals to set a charge cap on automatic enrolment workplace pensions.

It admits that it expects a charge cap of 1 per cent or 0.75 per cent  to mean that some providers will withdraw their offerings for smaller employers, leading to less choice and competition in this area of the market. The recent OFT review of workplace pensions rejected price capping.

The Government’s price capping proposals would drive more small employers into Nest which has caused much controversy in the pensions industry by deducting upfront charges of 1.8 per cent from employee contributions, in addition to the usual annual management charge.

This charging structure represents particularly poor value for employees who leave their employer after less than 5 years in the scheme, who will take with them a pension pot diminished by equivalent annual charges of between 3.8 per cent (if they leave after 1 year) and 1 per cent (if they leave after 5 years).

It would take five years in a Nest scheme before it became better value than a flat rate 1 per cent scheme  and 15 years to beat a 0.5 per cent AMC scheme. 

The taxpayer funded Nest scheme leaves employers with much of the work involved in setting up auto enrolment. Many of the private sector alternatives that a price cap could squeeze out offer employers more support to maximise the take up of auto enrolment amongst their employees, which is supposed to be the objective of the exercise.

Experience of price capping in other markets suggests that some pension providers will seek to recover their costs by making charges that fall outside of the price cap. The introduction of price capping is likely to drive private sector providers to adopt Nest’s approach of deducting some charges from pension contributions.

Other approaches will also emerge. For instance Legal & General already charge small employers £1000 for accessing their workplace pension product, this charge being in addition to L&G’s own annual charge taken from the pension fund.

So price capping is likely to displace further costs onto the UK’s hard pressed small employers and encourage the proliferation of more complex charging structures.

Analysis carried out for Royal London by management consultancy Deloitte suggests that competition offers a better solution for reducing pension charges levied on all defined contribution pension schemes.

The growth in the size of pension funds resulting from auto enrolment will produce significant scale economies enabling charges to fall by close to 40 per cent from the average level of around 51 basis points today.

Price competition between providers is vital to ensure that these gains go to pension scheme members in lower charges, rather than increasing dividends for insurance company shareholders. Price capping places these gains at risk if it establishes an effective price floor by reducing competition in the short term which is key to driving down charges in the medium term.

The Government’s thinking on price capping seems confused. In the household energy market where prices are set to soar the Government rejects price capping in favour of increasing the levels of competitive rivalry.

In the workplace pensions market where charges are set to fall the DWP proposes to introduce price controls that it accepts will undermine the very competition that will ensure charges are driven down. Is anyone in Government joining up the dots here?

If the DWP wishes to maximise the downwards pressure on pension charges it should introduce into the Pensions Act a requirement for all employers to review their schemes once every 5 years, and , unless there are good reasons to the contrary ,to switch to lower cost schemes where they find them. This, along with other recommendations made by the recent OFT review, will maximise competition in the market.

Phil Loney is chief executive at Royal London 


Loney-Phil-Royal London-2013

Royal London confirms sale of international arm

Royal London has sold its international division, Royal London 360°, to private equity firm Vitruvian Partners for an undisclosed sum. Royal London says the management buyout, led by Royal London 360° chief executive David Kneeshaw, will see the business rebranded as RL360°. It says there will be no job losses as part of the sale. […]


ABI launches ‘wide-ranging’ retirement policy review

The Association of British Insurers has launched a “wide-ranging” review into the UK retirement system and suggests “radical reform” is needed to help savers. The ABI says the review will aim to tackle a “chronic under saving culture” in the UK and will focus on people’s financial needs in and concerns about retirement, how effectively the […]


Bank of England eyes earlier interest rate rises as recovery takes hold

Bank of England governor Mark Carney says there is a 40 per cent chance his threshold for interest rate rises could be met by the end of next year. Under his forward guidance plans, unveiled in August, Carney said interest rates should not rise until unemployment falls below 7 per cent unless inflation was consistently […]


Pica launches pensions adviser directory

The Pensions Income Choice Association has launched a free directory of retirement advisers and brokers as part of an effort to encourage savers to shop around. The new ‘Pick-A’ directory, which opened to registration from advisers this week, is designed to provide a “shop window” for regulated retirement specialists to promote their services to savers […]

Brexit Commentary from Natixis Global Asset Management

By David F Lafferty, CFA, SVP – Chief Market Strategist Thursday’s historic Leave vote in the UK will have both immediate and long-term consequences for the global economy and financial markets. The initial flight-to-quality reaction across asset classes has been exacerbated by the market’s misplaced confidence in a Remain victory leading up to the vote. Stock markets […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Terence O'Halloran 13th November 2013 at 11:54 am

    The blind continue to lead the extremely short sighted. The damage that is being wrought by the continual interference with commercial decision making is designed and destined for one outcome and that is the nationalisation, at even greater cost per capita, of pension provision.

    Commerce is far more capable than the state where pension provision is concerned. Commercial activity is hampered by the cost of regulation and that needs to be addressed urgently.

  2. It would be nice if those making the decisions around auto-enrolment were prepared to stand by their decisions and opt out of their tax payer provided final salary pension schemes and join NEST.

    They might then be more focused on what it will actually give them when they retire rather than exclusively focusing on what it costs.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm