View more on these topics

Roger Edwards: More advice needed, not simplified products

We often get beaten up in the protection industry about the ‘small print’. But in truth we have fewer exclusions these days and thanks to the ABI’s standard critical illness definitions, it is clearer what is covered and what is not.

I was looking at other businesses where similar conditions exist and how those industries communicate them. Take the airline industry and the options available for buying tickets. Most people these days will visit a consolidator website like travelsupermarket, or go direct to the airline website to book. They will see a price but often not be completely aware of what the fare conditions are.

For instance, the most expensive BA economy fare will offer full flexibility for unlimited changes and a full refund in the event of cancellation. They will also offer a series of cheaper fares which allow changes to be made for £60 each but no refund at all on cancellation. Most low cost airlines follow the latter model – in fact it was they who forced BA to move to changeable tickets. Before low cost airlines a discounted fare would have been unchangeable and non-refundable.

Interestingly in the business class market, where the low cost airlines do not compete with BA, the discounted fares are still unchangeable and non-refundable. So someone could buy a discounted fare costing £1200 in business class from London to New York but if their plans change and they need to cancel they will lose that £1200. Is that fair? The airline would argue that it is clear in the fare rules (the small print). The customer is getting a much reduced fare (as against £5000 full price) and so loses the flexibility and the refundability, as a result.

These fare rules are available on the website. They are clear and easy to understand, but that still doesn’t stop people phoning up when they have had to cancel a discounted non-refundable fare to ask for a refund.

In the past it was the role of the travel agent to explain the airline fare rules. Now that people are increasingly buying direct the responsibility for understanding the conditions have passed to the customer.

In the protection market we have recently been having a debate about simplified products. While it is difficult to think how life insurance can be simplified (other than removing guaranteed insurability options), there have been suggestions that we need a simple critical illness product that only covers cancer, stroke and heart attack.

But even a three illness CI plan would have exclusions and conditions built into the definitions in the same way as the full plan. Would someone buying this direct be clear enough as to what was covered and what was not? Or would it be like buying an attractive and discounted airline ticket where you might glance over the conditions but click ‘yes’ anyway?

Simplified or not, protection products will always have conditions surrounding the offer. Given the difference between products surely the best approach for a customer is to take face to face advice and have all the conditions explained to them.

If that is the case then perhaps we need to channel more of our marketing spend into creating reasons for people to seek out such advice, rather than looking to create products that are perceived to be simple enough to bypass the advice process. With even the simplest of products there will always be exceptions to that simplicity.

Roger Edwards is propositions director at Bright Grey

Recommended

2

Ascentric: No logic to the cash rebate ban

Ascentric chief executive Hugo Thorman argues the FSA is wrong to impose a ban on cash rebates. See related articles (right) for more commentary.

Think small to build big

Small advice firms offer platforms the best opportunities to increase their assets, says software provider Focus Solutions. Speaking at The Platforum Technology Showcase in London last week, Focus lead business consultant Martin McKenna said larger distribution firms look to spread more of their business across a number of platforms with a back office software system […]

Technology & Fear

By Ali Unwin, Chief Technology Officer & Manager of the Neptune Global Technology Fund Fear has always been a key ingredient for technological experimentation and adoption, and today is no different. But when and where are these fears justified? asks Ali Unwin, Chief Technology Officer and Manager of the Neptune Global Technology Fund  Click here […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Ain’t that a fact Roger.

  2. Protection is mainly sold and not bought.

    Those who buy online from aggreagtors and bucket shops are gambling. Is it the right product, is it the right provider, etc.

    The oft suggested notion that simplified products will create queues at my office door is dented by reference to the Stakeholder mistake.

  3. All sensible arguments. The trouble is, this site preaches to the converted, and a sense of perspective isn’t usually at the top of a commercial website’s agenda.

    The current situation, with bucketfuls of unsuitable policies being sold via non-advised telesales specialists or supermarkets, resembles a de-regulation of the industry.

    The products and how they are administered are regulated by the FSA of course, but that is of limited use when compared to their suitability.

    Only fully independent advice can be of true use in protection. NOT tied, and NOT by use of provider ‘panels’. The ridiculous appearance of the RDR at this crucial time appears to be the final sword thrust.

    Sadly, it appears the IFA is a dying breed.

  4. @ Daniel – Whilst take your point, it needs to be remembered that RDR does not cover non investment protection.
    The section of your SCIDD which refers to proection cannot/does not refer to Independant as the definition for protection only business does not exist, even if like me, you are “independant” and will use whichever provider you can find you think most suitable for teh client and quote a fee which is the same whoever the provider is (offset against any commission which can’t be turned off)

  5. Dont Bright Grey offer simplified products direct to conusmer and have a simplified cic product or am I getting that wrong

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com