View more on these topics

Rocking in the free world

I would not like to be a client of Freedom Sipp right now.

It is unclear how many of the 350-odd Sipp investors who were with the firm last year are still customers but those who are could well be hit with a 40 per cent tax charge as early as next week. Not good.

HM Revenue & Customs has applied to have the Sipp provider wound up, which Money Marketing understands is to do with outstanding VAT payments.

If the Revenue’s application is accepted, it is likely to de-register the pension scheme, triggering an immediate 40 per cent tax charge on all assets.

Freedom Sipp’s terms and conditions state the charge would be passed to the firm’s clients, as is the case with the majority of Sipp operators.

At February last year, Freedom Sipp held assets worth £165m. On this basis, the tax charge payable would total £66m. Ouch.

Remaining clients could escape the punitive tax if another Sipp firm took over as scheme administrator of Freedom Sipp although the timescale and the extensive due diligence that would be necessary make this an unlikely option – if anyone wanted it in the first place.

Members can transfer out before the hearing but those holding commercial property may not have time.

The court hearing is the latest in a long line of regulatory predicaments for the firm. Freedom Sipp has been closed to new business since September last year.

The FSA changed the firm’s permission in July 2008 after finding it failed to seek the right customer authorisation before moving funds and failed to notify customers of charges deducted from their funds, among other things.

The FSA says it has made customers aware of the looming court case and its implications.

I believe the Freedom Sipp saga gives credence to Suffolk Life marketing director John Moret’s calls for Sipp operators to draw up living wills similar to those which look set to be imposed on the UK’s biggest banks.

In last week’s MM, Moret said: “The legal structure of Sipps is not straightforward and can vary from provider to provider.

“In the event of the scheme winding up, it is not always clear how benefits would be secured, particularly if there have been operational or regulatory difficulties.

“Applying a similar type of provision to living wills in Sipp schemes would certainly help in ensuring some consistency in the interpretation of winding-up provisions and some comfort for investors in knowing their investments would be protected and not subject to tax charges.”

There is also the question of liability. If HMRC wins in its endeavour to close Freedom Sipp down, and clients are subsequently stripped of 40 per cent of their pension fund, can the advisers who recommended the firm expect a knock on the door? Where does the buck stop?

If you would like to comment please click on the link below.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. David Trenner, Intelligent Pensions 17th September 2009 at 12:56 pm

    Did Neil Young ever run a SIPP?
    And does anyone think HMRC will have a Heart of Gold when it comes to the tax charge??

  2. Is the FSA acting in the interests of consumers and advisers?
    I don’t know. Do they?
    If the failure was on the part of a PPP provider, would it not be possible for the client to claim against them for the loss and then go to FOS, the firm to be declared in default and then the FSCS have to meet the loss?
    Unfortunately I don’t think this applies with SIPPs, so where does the buck stop?
    Why did it take the banking crisis for all the problems to start to appear?
    If the stress testing was done by the FSA (they’ve had nearly a decade to work out where things might go wrong), why didn’t they see these sort of probelsm coming and have an answer ready? Could ti be the stresses were so great or could it be they were enjoying focusing on the box ticking efficiency of the part of the industry which has LEAST systemic risk, i.e. IFAs too much?

  3. The Freedom SIPP and HMRC
    I have property and money in my sipp which unfortunately is with the Freedom SIPP, due to their inefficiency I have never had a tax rebate, does this mean I don’t have to refund the HMRC with monies I have never had, if it does am I not able to claim this money from the directors??

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm