View more on these topics

Robert Sinclair: The first real test for the FCA


The FCA is encouraging firms to register early to assist in the migration from the OFT all those firms covered by the Consumer Credit Act.

While this will have limited impact for investment, mortgage or insurance intermediaries, it will bring about significant change for the second mortgage market. The other group it is likely to have most impact on is the FCA itself.

This will be the first real test of the new regulator. It has promised to be different and better than its predecessors but its scope and reach is about to be severely tested. Credit comes with some big rocks to be lifted and some dark creatures underneath.

Its first challenge will have to be payday lending. These are businesses that currently might leave a nasty taste in the mouth but do broadly act within the law.

But to deliver consumer protection, some protracted legal battles loom which will stretch further the FCA’s limited resources. These changes will also bring the world of bridging finance closer to a unified approach.

Because of the concurrent implementation of the European Mortgages Directive, how second charge loans are incorporated into the full mortgage regime risks forcing the need to consider a further advance or remortgage in all cases, so strangling this specialist sector.

Further, how a new unitary consumer credit authorisation might operate versus the multi-dimensional approach previously favoured by the OFT remains to be seen. There are more sub-sets in consumer credit than in the current core investment, pensions, mortgage and insurance regimes.

All this presents significant challenges without lifting the lid on the debt management sector, which many feel might be another area of serious consumer detriment. 

The FCA operates under a new legal mandate where it must protect consumers. A conven-ient approach might be to apply a stronger competition flavour to its actions as it would be easy to try to drive transparency and disclosure as a means to promote more competitive markets. In theory this should work and in consumption economics and marketing it tends to. However, financial services is a barrier, service product set where consumers apply different values and judgements that do not naturally lend themselves to this. Service economics and marketing is just different, subject to totally illogical human decisions.

In addition, the AMI is looking to get mortgage brokers removed from the consumer credit regime unless they are undertaking specific lending activities. Where they only hold the licence to discuss or consolidate unsecured consumer credit, this should be covered within MCOB and their mortgage permissions. This would simplify the landscape considerably.

Credit issues are framed on well tested legal precedent. In moving this regime, assurances have been given about some of the important protections to consumers afforded by the current legislation. These are complex issues on consideration periods, cancellation rights, purchase protection and early redemption protection. The Ami and the AFB are ready for the discussions.

Robert Sinclair is chief executive of the Association of Mortgage Intermediaries


Ian Naismith: Forget charges, investment is key

As automatic enrolment gathers pace, a rapidly increasing number of employers will choose a pension scheme for their staff, many of them for the first time. But how will they decide? The Scottish Widows Workplace Pensions Report for 2013 reveals the top three features employers expect to take into account are investment performance (highlighted by […]


Precise stops offering interest-only on homeowner range

Precise Mortgages has decided to stop offering an interest-only option on its homeowner range due to low take-up. The intermediary-only lender continues to offer an interest-only option on its buy-to-let and bridging ranges. Precise says only 3 per cent of new business in its homeowner range is on an interest-only basis, and as a result […]


Ukip wants personal allowance hike and cuts to corporation tax

Ukip wants to raise the personal income tax allowance to above the minimum wage and slash corporation tax to 10 per cent as the party begins to set out its economic plans ahead of the 2015 general election. Speaking at a fringe event on tax at the party’s annual conference in London last week, Ukip head […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I would perhaps argue whether advisers should continue to hold a CCL. Holding a CCL when a firm’s advisers are already subject to the FCA rules and supervisory process seems a little OTT.
    Anyhow a little sympathy should be extended to the FCA since the process of initial migration is in itself a huge task. The OFT holds very little data about firms and surprisingly contact details and addresses are not held. The OFT was fairly ineffectual and the FCA will need to show it is more proactive but having just paid £245 just to register which took all of 30 seconds (payment took longer which is another issue!) it irritates be beyond words that the adviser community are paying for something which we should not need, subsidising the FCA costs in setting up their systems and underwriting the lack of resources that the Government have so badly failed to provide. Registering should have been £30 max.

  2. On quite what basis Mr Sinclair classifies a budget of £578.4m is something I’d be interested to read. The FSA Mk.II could save massive amounts of money by making economies on several fronts.

    As for borrowing and lending, the maximum allowable rates of interest on payday loans should be drastically reined in and unsecured borrowing (from all sources in aggregate) should be limited to 3 months nett income.

    Okay, the FSA may not have the power to enact such laws (it has plenty of its own to enact over intermediaries), but were it to recommend such laws to the Treasury or Parliament and nothing was then done, it could legitimately hold up its hands and say We’ve made our recommendations, it’s now up to Parliament to act on them. And let us never forget…

    The Regulators’ Compliance Code is a central part of the Government’s better regulation agenda. Its aim is to embed a risk-based, proportionate and targeted approach to regulatory inspection and enforcement among the regulators it applies to.

    Our expectation is that as regulators integrate the Code’s standards into their regulatory culture and processes, they will become more efficient and effective in their work. They will be able to use their resources in a way that gets the most value out of the effort that they make, whilst delivering significant benefits to low risk and compliant businesses through better-focused inspection activity, increased use of advice for businesses, and lower compliance costs.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm