View more on these topics

Robert Reid: Pensions guidance cannot exist in scripts alone

Rob-Reid-MM-Peach-700.jpg

Paul Lewis’ recent column in Money Marketing provoked a lorry load of comments and reinstated the debate on financial journalists remaining exempt from competence requirements. I am sure many journalists could confirm their competence with minimal preparation but, for some, it could be a barrier that would impede rather than empower them.

I recall being asked to prepare a case study by a major Sunday broadsheet and, when I failed to mention any of its regular advertisers, I was asked to rewrite the piece so they were included. Being active investment houses this was problematic because, as a firm, we have used passive funds for many years.

In the end I dropped out of the article and found one of my peers had happily capitulated instead, compromising themselves and overlooking the very conflict of interest ignored by the publishers of so many newspapers. The double standards in play have always concerned me as some personal finance editors have directly benefited from these deals. 

If we consider commercial radio, for example, where it is not possible for advertisements to be placed in such advantageous situations, why are newspapers not bound by a similar rule?

I should make it clear I have no agenda here – I just prefer people to access information or guidance without any bias. This is particularly so with regards to the new options for pensions.

It is clear to me that much of the public will be less than convinced of the need for or the price of advice, so until they receive all of the information they need to digest we need to tread carefully.

Many providers will be less than keen to operate what is no longer seen as a pension plan but as a bank account instead. Those who seek to withdraw the fund over a short period may find their provider requires them to move to a more recent plan. 

But before the public rush to complain about the cost of moving to a new plan they need to be reminded of what happens elsewhere. For example, if someone wanted the new features of an iPhone 6, their phone provider would ask them to either pay more or to move to a different contract. With this in mind, being charged to move to a new flexible pension account is no different.

Putting things into context is essential if we are to successfully communicate with the general public. What is more, clear communication is the only way to obtain informed consent.

We all have a part to play and agreeing to use a standardised set of graphics would help. For instance, when people chat to friends the information delivered by those graphics would help prevent the confusion that so often arises when two people have two totally different ideas about the same issue. If widely adopted, then it could even go viral. 

Guidance cannot exist in scripts alone. We have to be more creative in order to help people make more informed choices. 

Robert Reid is managing director at Syndaxi Chartered Financial Planners

Recommended

Mark-Barnett-MM-700.jpg

Mark Barnett: Why I’m buying into support services

The support services sector of the FTSE All Share comprises companies providing outsourced services to a wide range of industries and public sector entities. The fortunes of these companies inevitably vary with those of the end markets they serve as well as with the underlying profitability of their business models. As such, the share price […]

Steve-Webb-thoughtful-response-in-2014-700.png
10

Webb turns screw on providers over legacy charges

Pensions minister Steve Webb has once again threatened to “name and shame” providers who refuse to tackle legacy issues. Pressure has been growing on providers to tackle old, relatively expensive schemes since an audit found up to £26bn of assets subject to charges over 1 per cent.  A 0.75 per cent cap on auto-enrolment default […]

Ed-Balls-700x450.jpg
10

Labour ‘could slash lifetime allowance to fund tuition fee cuts’

The Labour Party is reportedly planning to lower tuition fees by removing tax breaks on offer to pensions savers. The Times reports that Labour is planning to drop the ceiling for tuition fees from £9,000 to £6,000. However, to fund the move, shadow chancellor Ed Balls will reportedly target tax incentives offered to pension savers […]

Artemis Monthly Distribution Fund: positioning and outlook

Managers James Foster and Jacob de Tusch-Lec outline the fund’s investment approach and discuss current investment themes and outlook for the bond and equity markets. As James and Jacob confirm, the Artemis Monthly Distribution Fund’s aim is to generate an income from both equities and bonds. They explain their investment approach in each asset class, the sectors where they are […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Agreed….. a picture paints a thousand words. Unfortunately I don’t think the F-pack like the idea of pictures as risk warnings. Mind you I did manage to get them to accept that a suitability report can be oral, picture or written and it is the consumers choice as to delivery (and price) based on how they assimilate information. A blind person will probably want audio or braille for instance and an illiterate (they do still exist) will want visual or spoken. It is the structure and understandability of the message which is at issue, not the medium and a suitability report simply needs to be durable.

  2. Rob

    I agree people should make “informed choices!” 🙂

  3. @Nick – and they want to escape from all their financial worries 🙂

  4. “a major Sunday broadsheet”

    A fiver says it was the Telegraph.

    Product placement is a modern day scourge. If you’ve ever wondered why the Apple logo on your laptop is upside down from the perspective of the user, it’s so that in the endless paid-for appearances in TV shows and films, the logo appears right-way-up from the perspective of the camera. Marketing takes precedence over the user of the product.

    Likewise, many newspaper articles are written not for the benefit of the reader but for the advertisers. In the money section this goes from being an annoyance to downright dangerous. You’d like to think that paying the price on the masthead would entitle you to objective journalism, but the fact is that the majority of readers are consuming the content for free on the Internet – and if you’re getting something for free, it means that you are the product.

  5. As long as these graphics are like iPhone’s rather than Blackberry’s it will be OK

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com