View more on these topics

Rob Clifford: Managing the post-MMR storm

Advisers need to manage client expectations amid the long delays in mortgage processing

Rob-Clifford-MM-Peach-700.png

With 26 April having passed, you might say that the “phoney MMR war” is over and the struggle of the new world begins.

It is, of course, very early days but there are already strong suggestions that this post-MMR period is not likely to be plain sailing for advisers despite the rules ultimately favouring the intermediary, whether or not that is an unintended consequence.

We are already seeing and feeling the consequences of many lenders having left their systems and process changes until relatively late in the day. This, coupled with a decision by many to maintain product pricing that has kept their offerings at the top of the sourcing lists, has meant that the ability of some lenders to deal with their growing pipeline of applications has been compromised.

This combination of factors has without doubt slowed down the speed of mortgage processing and resulted in growing delays in some lenders’ ability to issue mortgage offers. We now face a situation where some lenders, who were previously able to turn around cases in a couple of days, are now only just beginning to process cases submitted by intermediaries over a month ago. Add in the more discerning underwriting and documentary evidence required for post-MMR cases and you can begin to see how the business of getting our clients their mortgage offer is taking longer and longer.

Given the lengthening of application processing times, advisers probably find themselves between a rock and a hard place at the moment. While some lenders recently made the decision to tackle their backlogs by withdrawing leading products towards the end of April, others have not. We therefore have the situation where a number of lenders that are working through their pipelines are stil offering best buy rates.

This makes the adviser’s recommendation process more of a challenge. While the client often seeks the best rate, an adviser will know only too well the frustration a client feels (and will happily vent) if their mortgage offer is delayed as a result of being placed with a lender with poor service levels. The good adviser will provide transparent advice with regards to both pricing and processing efficiency so the client does not have unrealistic expectations.

It is disappointing that many industry folk are already discussing the negative impact of MMR so soon after its implementation It was reasonable to expect that new application volumes would have slowed as a result of MMR, a consequence of which might have been improved processing speeds, but this is not the case.

Instead, advisers are facing something of a perfect storm, with lenders implementing their system changes too late, having to adopt new underwriting requirements with haste and being seemingly unwilling to reprice products to stem new flow. No doubt the regulator and lenders will regard this as inevitable teething problems of a new regime but it’s entirely to the consumers’ advantage that the intermediary market is well-placed to manage expectations and minimise some of the significant inconvenience to borrowers, much of which could have been avoided.

Rob Clifford is chief executive of If I Were You

Recommended

News Brief

CPD May Briefing: FCA’s ‘zombie fund’ announcement lacked brains

The latest edition of Newsbrief counts as 1 hour of structured CPD and covers the regulatory and marketplace changes that took place during April 2014. Visit the Money Marketing CPD Centre to answer 10 multiple choice questions and complete this CPD activity. Just click into your CPD Plan and you’ll find each month’s marketplace changes round-up […]

Aviva-signage-building-2013-700.jpg

Aviva targets bulk annuities after Budget pensions overhaul

Aviva plans to target the bulk annuities market in response to Government reforms that have led to a sharp decline in demand for individual annuities. The provider’s interim management statement, published this morning, reveals a 22 per cent slump in the value of new business written by its UK arm during the first quarter of […]

Streatfield-Malcolm-Lighthouse-Standing-2013-700x450.jpg
2

Lighthouse shareholders oppose director pay and bonuses

Around a third of Lighthouse shareholders have voiced disapproval of the Aim-listed network’s bonus and director pay proposals on the back of the latest company accounts. In March, Lighthouse posted pre-tax losses of £1.6m whilst setting aside £310,000 in redress. The accounts included a cumulative bonus of £90,000 for chief executive Malcolm Streatfield and finance […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com