View more on these topics

Richard Verdin: Protection intermediaries must develop an influential voice

Richard Verdin MM blog

In any industry, having a coherent, consistent, clear conversation with your stakeholders is critical if you want your point of view to be understood and appreciated. 

In financial services we need to have dialogue with all sorts of stakeholders: consumer groups, regulators, the FOS, politicians, Government departments – and of course other trade bodies representing other significant industry segments.

But above and beyond this, in any line of work, industries want to have influence over events which affect them. And it is for this reason that trade associations exist.

Most trade bodies represent relatively diverse interests, yet it makes sense for parties with generally aligned interests to congregate under a single banner for the greater advantage of all concerned.  Large congregations result in being seen as more significant and therefore ‘important’ and of course there is advantage in pooling resources and concentrating skills.

The ABI is a pretty good example of a well organised trade body in financial services which represents a number of diverse yet congruous interests. It has a board, with various board committees reporting to it.

These committees focus on regulation, running the association as an entity with other committees organised around the main activities of their members. There is a general insurance committee, an investment committee and a long term savings and life insurance committee (catchily known as the LTSLIC). These board committees then have various specialised sub-committees to represent and focus on all the detailed interests of their members. One of which of course is the protection committee, reporting to the LTSLIC.

Often the protection committee finds that on some of its initiatives (and some of the industry risks) it would be very helpful if it could liaise and work with an equivalent body representing the interests of protection intermediaries. Unfortunately no such representative body exists. However, whether such a body should or could exist has been the source of much debate recently, so I thought I would chuck in my ‘two penn’orth’.

As an individual who has spent half his working life as an intermediary and the other half working in large providers, it has always struck me how much benefit protection intermediaries would get from having a single, coherent, consistent and clear voice on the big issues affecting this important market segment.

Right now there are various parties organising themselves into groups and others researching the need for such a group. But whatever the outcome, for any group to be effective, it has to have the scale to be representative, the skills necessary to operate and the organisation and the resources necessary to function. A standalone body (separate from the current trade bodies) would simply dilute any approach and potentially confuse the intermediary voice. I know that if I was currently an intermediary I would be arguing forcefully that any group needs to develop within one of the already well established, well connected experienced intermediary trade bodies which doesn’t only represent a single product line.

It’s time for protection intermediaries (advised, non-advised, tied, multi-tied and whole of market) to develop a voice with influence for the health of this increasingly important, yet increasingly scrutinised market.

Richard Verdin is managing director of protection at Aviva


Alliance Trust Savings poaches Standard Life international manager

Alliance Trust Savings has appointed Standard Life international propositions manager Sara Wilson as head of platform proposition. Wilson will head up ATS platform development across both its intermediary and direct channels. ATS proposition and service director Elaine Maddison says: “Sara’s appointment to the management team will help drive the development of our proposition to further […]

Schroder UK Alpha Plus: How Richard Buxton and Philip Matthews compare

Jupiter’s Philip Matthews has been named as Richard Buxton’s successor on the Schroder UK Alpha Plus fund. How do the two fund managers compare? Matthews is currently the sole manager of the £366m Jupiter Growth & Income fund and co-manager on the Jupiter Income and Jupiter UK Alpha funds. He will join Schroders in October, while […]

Mark Prisk announces first 45 projects to use £1bn Build to Rent fund

Housing minister Mark Prisk has today announced the first 45 projects that will take advantage of the £1bn Build to Rent fund which is expected to provide 10,000 new homes in the private rental sector by 2015. A quarter of the projects will be in London, however, the Department for Communities and Local Government is […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 6 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Isn’t this exactly what Tom Bagrie recently announced he is forming?

  2. No, I don’t think it is.

  3. Well “Tom….is forming” is perhaps a little previous Ian. I’m working with several other protection distrubutors of like mind to work out how we get our sector a distinctive voice. For us upholding standards forms a key part of that, but the need to be heard in Brussels is vital and that’s a daunting task indeed. So Richard’s points above are very valid. Trouble is of course if he gets involved, how do you stop him from taking it all over? No one has yet managed that in any sphere I can think of?! (now treat these brackets as one of those smiley face puntiation things). Mind you , his incogruous use of the non-word ‘congruous’, when he meant ‘congruent’ pleased this particularly impertinent pedant. (ditto re smiley face thing).

  4. For the avoidance of doubt, all typoes in the above are of course intentional irony. Am now off to Specsavers.

  5. “He” will definitely not be getting involved. “He’ simply wants to encourage the development of such a voice and ‘nudge’ it toward existing, relevant, respected organisations with the financial support and skills necessary to makes its success more likely.

  6. Being pretty anti “bodies” my only suggestion would be to let the Protection Review team create a body. They already do excellent protection roadshows which some of my underwriters present at, they know the business and the people intimately, they already run the pre-eminent trade event and as far as I am are broadly independent.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm