View more on these topics

Richard Buxton: The hard facts on a soft Brexit

Investor discipline is required more than ever when political emotions are running high

Buxton Richard Old MutualPolitically, we are a nation divided. Young against old. Haves against have-nots. Remainers against Brexiteers. The electorate has never been so disaffected. Forget balanced budgets and a hard Brexit; it seems now is the time for a new government to adopt a more redistributive mantle. Whether it does so with Theresa May at the helm remains to be seen.

But while political emotions run high, as investors we are required to be more disciplined.

The reactions of both the internationally oriented FTSE 100 index and its smaller, more domestically focused counterpart the FTSE 250 following the general election result were both measured and logical.

And while pundits had proclaimed that any political upsets would unfold in the currency markets, sterling’s fall against the US dollar was contained. A far cry from the plunge seen on the night of the Brexit vote.

Inevitably, the slight softening in the pound against the greenback favoured the share prices of the big international resource stocks of the FTSE 100 – the likes of Glencore and Rio Tinto.

Yet, at a fundamental level, the prices of mining stocks have been dictated far more by upward revisions to earnings estimates rather than any swings in currency markets. After all, earnings trajectories are what really matter to investors.

European funds outperform UK since Brexit vote

That said, investors have been scratching their heads over the behaviour of bonds and equities for some time now. The pull-back in bond yields would suggest some macroeconomic weakness. The bond market appears to have given up all hope that President Donald Trump will be able to deliver anything in the way of tax reform or fiscal stimulus package to help pick up any economic slack.

By contrast, the current levels of global equity markets, standing near to all-time highs, would suggest that profits growth is still forthcoming and the economic outlook benign.

And what of the behaviour of bond proxies: the likes of Unilever, British American Tobacco, and Reckitt Benckiser? Those FTSE stalwarts which produce strong and stable profits (where have we heard those words before?) year in, year out, irrespective of the economic cycle?

While the debate between the merits of bond proxies versus economically sensitive stocks will doubtless rumble on, we know that some things rarely alter.

We know that the sentiment towards UK banks will only change for the better once interest rates are on a gently rising path. The actions of the US Federal Reserve, and the likelihood of a third hike, should help in this respect. Here in the UK, interest rates will not rise as long as the uncertainty over Brexit negotiations prevails. Witness the difference in share price performance of dollar-sensitive HSBC against pure sterling-exposed Lloyds.

We know that the dynamics of the housing market mirror industry fundamentals rather than the short-term plight of the UK consumer. Here is a sector that has been driven by capital discipline and clever landbank purchases.

We also know that the fortunes of the consumer-facing stocks will be much more data dependent going forward, as investors focus on which way the current softness in consumer spending goes next. Rising inflation and anaemic wage growth are not an easy combination for the UK consumer to digest.

So, back to those all-important Brexit talks. While the negotiations themselves may well be delayed, the clear message from the young is that a hard Brexit is not for them. Without the mandate for the hard Brexit she sought, May will surely have to work towards a softer Brexit, or extended transitional arrangements? A pull-back from the threat of a “no deal” Brexit abyss should put a floor under sterling for the time being.

Investors must retain a sense of perspective. Near term, the outlook is relatively healthy. Global trade is picking up, European consumption is gathering momentum and Asian companies are riding a wave of corporate upgrades on the back of an uptick in economic activity.

But longer term, storm clouds could well gather over the UK. The result of the election might mean that a fiercely redistributive government is possible at some point.

Excess labour worldwide and the disinflationary impact of technological change make it hard for central banks to generate any inflation, even if they want to. Arguably, for too long, we have seen capital rewarded at the expense of labour. That tide is already beginning to turn, with gradual rises in the minimum wage.

But add the probability of future fiscal policies to the mix and, some years out, we could see the return of both significant wage and price inflation.

Those under 35 are the first generation to face the prospect of being worse off than their parents. Capitalism is not working for them. With no memory of the disasters of post-war socialist government and runaway inflation, Jeremy Corbyn’s agenda is immensely appealing.

If, at some point in the coming months, UK shares have to price in the end of the post-1979 pro-market policies and a return to a pro-labour, anti-business agenda, then they have a long way to fall.

Richard Buxton is head of UK equities at Old Mutual Global Investors

Recommended

Euros-EU-Money-Currency-Europe-700x450.jpg

European funds outperform UK since Brexit vote

European fund performance has trounced the UK in the year since the Brexit vote in the Investment Association equity sectors, new analysis reveals. Today the UK and European Union began Brexit negotiations almost one year since the 23 June referendum. Since the shock result, Theresa May has committed to a so-called “hard” Brexit, involving exit from […]

Trouble ahead - thumbnail

Pensions: trouble ahead?

The pace of change in the pension’s space has been little short of astonishing, and has left thousands of employers struggling to keep their pension policy compliant, and also on the right side of current best practice and governance. Many employers, and indeed many in the pensions industry itself, would like to see a period of no change during the next term of government. This would give all sides a chance to catch up and draw breath. 

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. A good article Richard and I agree with you regarding Corbyn’s agenda. As a Labour-voting student then teacher from 1973 – 1986, I was also seduced by the promises, handouts and outright bribes but, while governments can often get out of/creatively account for or inflate their way out of debt repayment, we as individuals cannot and it is ordinary people and communities who suffered the inevitable consequences. You are right that younger people think we should give it a go but, with the far greater sense of entitlement in society, with the inroads AI will make into all the labour markets, the consequences will be even more severe. Remember that a lot of their proposals will never impact upon these champagne socialists with their own and their children’s private education and all the other ‘comforts’ they have built up – Lady Nugee being a prime example – and you should read her Wikipedia entry.

    I do disagree with you on one point however in that it is not ‘capitalism’ that isn’t working for the young but extreme capitalism or globalisation which actually only really benefits a very small business and political elite in the long term. Take freedom of movement in its current form which provides employers with such a large supply of talent that they can suppress wages and indulge in questionable working practices – no wonder they are keen to maintain the status quo! But what about the countries they leave behind? With up to 50% of their 18 – 25s migrating westwards (and they are usually the best and the brightest) this can only make it harder for these countries to increase their standard of living so they have to go to Brussels with their begging bowl. This suits Brussels mightily as all these countries become client states, addicted to this easy money and thus subservient to the EU’s ultimately self-serving agenda. The irony of the situation is clear to behold, have a good day!

Leave a comment