View more on these topics

Revealed: The MPs who will scrutinise Govt plans for financial regulation

The House of Commons has confirmed the six MPs who will sit on a committee to scrutinise the Government’s proposed changes to the regulatory architecture.

The MPs on the committee will be Labour MP for Leeds East George Mudie and Conservative MP for Bury St Edmunds David Ruffley, who are both members of the Treasury select committee, Labour MP for Newcastle upon Tyne East Nicholas Brown, Conservative MP for Hitchen and Harpenden Peter Lilley, Conservative MP for Warrington South David Mowat and Liberal Democrat MP for Yeovil David Laws.

The Government published its draft Financial Services Bill in June. It sets out plans to split the FSA into the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority and to set up the Financial Policy Committee to ensure financial stability. The draft bill will now go through 12 weeks of pre-legislative scrutiny after summer recess – the Treasury wanted it to be begin before the break – before the committee reports by December 1.

Mudie says he wants to focus on accountability of the regulators while Ruffley says he wants to look at worries that having two regulators could lead to duplicate regulation.

The twelve member committee will also feature six Lords who have yet to be announced.

Last night was the fifth time the motion was tabled. After the first, Labour MPs John Mann and Thomas Docherty placed amendments asking for Liberal Democrat MP David Laws to be removed from the committee. Each time MPs objected to the motion which led to it being debated last night.

Laws was suspended from the House of Commons for seven days in May after standards and privileges committee report found him guilty of a “series of serious breaches of the rules of the house of commons over a considerable time”.

Speaking in Parliament last night, Docherty said he has severe doubts about whether Laws is “adequately suited to the task” of scrutinising the draft bill.

He said: “I absolutely believe that if someone is forced to pay back £56,000 to which they were not entitled because they had knowingly misled the taxpayer – the fees office – they should be excluded from being a member who oversees the new financial services regulation.”

A member of the new committee, David Mowat, defended Laws, asking: “How many of the nominees does he think know more about international financial services than the right honourable member for Yeovil?”

Speaking to Money Marketing, Liberal Democrat MP and Treasury select committee member John Thurso says: “This was a couple of good old-fashioned old labour chancers using some parliamentary procedures to cause problems for David Laws. He has an exceptional brain, is extremely good on regulation and working on bills committees is a good way to work his way back in.”

According to Hansard, the written record of Parliamentary proceedings, when Docherty called in the debate for Laws to be left out of the committee MPs shouted “shame”. In the end the motion with all six members was passed by 297 votes to six.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Seriously, if David Laws, really did knowingly mislead the tax payer and obtain £56,000 by (regardless of whether he paid it back or not) by breaking six rules regarding expenses and then being suspended from Parliament does that make him not “fit and proper?” And should that disqualify him from participating in the formation of an organisation that will determine whether other people are fit and proper?!

  2. Another Pissed Off IFA 19th July 2011 at 1:30 pm

    So, according to Liberal Democrat MP and Treasury Select Committee member John Thurso, people who defraud the taxpayer by fiddling their expenses are entitled to ‘work their way back in’.

    Where does it say that in the FSA Handbook? Maybe he’s just making it all up….

    No wonder the TSC response to the RDR has been so crass if we have people like this on the committee.

    I think this illustrates the problem – the FSA and parliament assume we are all as bad as they are.

  3. Julian Stevens 20th July 2011 at 9:46 am

    “chancers using some parliamentary procedures to cause problems for David Laws”?? The bloke defrauded the tax payer to the tune of £56,000 for Christ’s sake, for which he should have gone to prison. Hasd he been an IFA, the FSA would have struck him off permananently without hope of ever being reauthorised, fined him handsomely and probably pursued a criminal prosecution. The unfortunate ex-Park Row people, who appear to have done nothing wrong but have been effectively damned by mere association, have been treated worse. It stinks.

  4. David Laws used to work for me proir to becoming a M P I have nothing but admiration for his intelligence and ethics he is a fine person. Thomas Docherty has spent many years sitting on his arse causing trouble his constituents should do the right thing by him at the next election and remove him

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm