View more on these topics

Retirements ruined by Barclays advisers singling out specialist fund

Heard the one about the plumber, the bricklayer and the engineer? It should be a joke but it isn’t.

In 2006/07, all three were in or close to retirement. All three were looking for income. All three were inexperienced investors who received advice from their high-street bank’s wealth management service.

The plumber had £450,000 from the sale of his business. The adviser placed it all in a unit trust. Not a portfolio. One unit trust.

The bricklayer had two unit-linked investment bonds and an Isa, whose total value was £95,000. His adviser cashed in the bonds and transferred the Isa, reinvesting the whole lot into a unit trust. not a portfolio. One unit trust.

The engineer had three with-profits bonds with a surrender value of £360,000. His adviser cashed them all in and reinvested the lot in a unit trust. Not a portfolio. A single unit trust.

Three different advisers from three different branches of the same bank. Barclays.

Three different advisers but all of them chose the same unit trust – Morley (now Aviva) balanced global income fund. Launched June 2006. Performance to March 2009 over the past 12 months: -45.1 per cent.

All three clients had their retirement years ruined by this catastrophic outcome, two of them with losses exceeding £150,000.

I am certain that no IFA would ever invest all of a client’s money in a single unit trust, let alone this one, which had no track record and features in the Invest – ment Management Asso – ciation’s specialist sector.

This sector is for funds “outside the mainstream”. This fund invests in convertibles, call options, non-investment-grade bonds and equities – hardly a core fund for the unsophisticated low-risk investor.

I am not sure that Barclays has a compliance department. If it does, how could it have approved the churning and lack of diversification displayed here?

Barclays does, however, have a complaints’ department. The plumber is the only one yet to have had a reply to his complaint. Barclays told him that because he held “windfall shares” worth £8,500, he was an “experienced” investor who must have known the risk he was taking.

No exper – ienced investor would put all his money into a single “specialist” unit trust. Only inexperienced investors and Barc lays advisers would do that, QED, the client is not an exp – erienced investor. His comp – laint is now with the Financial Ombudsman Service.

What was the incentive that attracted the advisers to this fund? It seems that trail commission of 1.05 per cent a year was paid on this fund, which, of course, is twice as much as on most unit trusts and at least four times as much as corporate bond funds, many of which pay no trail at all.

I now have six clients in various parts of the country with the same Barclays/Aviva experience. We believe there are hundreds, perhaps thousands. of people wrongly invested in this high-risk fund.

We are setting up a website inviting other victims to come forward with a view to instigating a class action. We would be pleased to hear from IFAs who have clients with the same complaint.

And to those of you reading in a more venal spirit, don’t expect that handsome trail commission to come over to you with the servicing rights – it is all sewn up in the product commission and it goes to Barclays in perpetuity.

Richard Davis

Park House Financial Services

Tatsfield, Surrey


Platforms blasted on risk ratings

An adviser has hit out at the way that platforms assess the risk of individual funds after a Zurich fund which was assigned a low-risk rating fell by almost 20 per cent in value.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Dear Richard.

    I have read with interest your page although I have no pension with Barclays , it has left me with questions. I am in the process of Bankruptcy and awaiting discharge of which the Barclays advisor knew as they were closing my accounts and opening a basic account. Their first advisor brought my attention to Life insurance and accident insurance with Aviva of which I declined due to financial restraints. I visited the Branch last week with a query on my account and once again a second advisor went straight to the Life insurance and accident Insurance with Aviva of which I thought was sensible to take upon her advise as I am a self employed DJ with out any cover. Is their advice normal practice and am I wise to have taken out these policies whilst awaiting discharge from Bankruptsy. The cost of the two policies were cheaper than going to Aviva direct

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm