View more on these topics

Retirement reform

Raise the state pension age to 75 to head off a crisis

john_jory.gif

The UK needs a far more radical solution if it is to defuse the perfect storm brewing over the retirement prospects of millions of people in the UK.

The proportion of workers relative to those taking their state pension is reducing steadily. Longevity has improved massively, leaving many trying to fund a retirement longer than their working career. The long bull market runs of past decades look increasingly like history, undermining personal saving and investment prospects.

Together with changing employment trends, generous occupational pensions are nearing extinction. As the current economic climate turns cold – Britain is far closer to going bust than anyone would have guessed just four years ago – dramatic spending cuts and even higher taxes are just around the corner, whatever the pre-election spin doctors are saying.

The gentle and protracted tinkering around the edges of pension reform of the last 20 years is not just fiddling while Rome burns but has become a contributory factor. There have been small steps in the right direction but while one ineffective pensions bill after another has given politicians the opportunity to claim they have addressed the problem, in reality, the flames are burning ever brighter. If more people could see through the smokescreen, the upcoming election would be fought on retirement reform as much as deficit reduction.

Here is one idea worth consdering. Why not move the age at which state pension is paid to, say, 75? At this point, it would be far more generous than the current level, and increasing with the higher of price or salary inflation. Up to 75, from whatever age the individual and their employer chooses, responsibility for funding is up to them.

The main strength of this idea is that people will know precisely what the state will provide and when, and the pot will be bigger – more than just poverty prevention, which is currently the case. Up to age 75, people will know their income provision is their responsibility and that the
period is finite, shorter and so more affordable. Some may choose to retire as soon as their savings allow. Many will wind down to full retirement
over time, working part-time. Others may work full-time right up retirement, either by choice or necessity if they have not saved sufficiently.

All this would require holistic reform, meaning changes to employment law to encourage and facilitate older working, measures to address the particular challenges for those in manual occupations and changes to long-term savings structures to improve flexibility and incentives.

I would argue these wider reforms are all perfectly achievable and many will be necessary even without the impetus of a bigger overhaul of UK retirement income provision.

I am not suggesting this is the only idea of merit in the search for ways to head off the storm but it is indicative of the scale of change we must
get working on as soon as possible – before it is too late.

John Jory is director general of the Centre for Retirement Reform

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What a load of ill-considered, head in the clouds tosh John Jory spouts.

    Just what the UK needs – another quango of already wealthy, highly paid dreamers telling everyone else what they must do.

    The trouble with the UK State pension is that it isn’t funded and those who do work, pay for the pensions of those that no longer do and many that never have. To suggest those same people work another seven years is ludicrous.

    Maybe if we made those who run the country, and their servants who draft the legislation, give up their grace and favour pensions, pay a fair rate for their gilt edged pensions, stop accepting highly paid gravy train posts when they retire at 60 and be subject to the same pension limitations that they impose on everyone else, then that would be a start.

    We must protect the vulnerable and disabled but when official statistics claim that one in six of the population is registered disabled, the UK must already be a very dangerous workplace and awful place to live. But who am I to question the statistics produced by a highly paid public servant?

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com