View more on these topics

RBS facing court action over ‘unethical’ account closures

A group of Iranian bank customers are taking court action against Royal Bank of Scotland for racial discrimination after being informed their accounts are to be closed.

Cheshire-based Blackstone Solicitors is representing nine customers who were written to last month by RBS to advise them their accounts would be closed in 60 days.

After Blackstone issued an injunction, RBS agreed voluntarily not to close the accounts until a determination by the court.

Blackstone managing director Emma Nawaz says the customers are “ordinary people” who have been selected for account closure on the basis of their race alone. She calls RBS’s actions “wholly unethical”.

Nawaz believes the bank’s actions are connected to a fine of $100m it received last month from US regulators for breaching sanctions with Iran, Burma, Cuba and Sudan.

Nawaz says: “These are ordinary people, including teachers and students. They are second generation families who should consider themselves wholly British and integrated into society.”

She says Blackstone has been contacted by other affected customers, and has made an application for a group litigation order.

A spokeswoman for RBS says: “We are required to comply with our regulatory obligations and are unable to comment on decisions made in relation to individual accounts.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I will be interested to see just how “ordinary” these people are. No matter how bad I think RBS are (and I do think they are a shower of cr*p) I dont believe for one second that even RBS would do this due to the customers being Iranian. I think there will be more to this. I wait to see the outcome

  2. Marty

    I guess you are not far off the mark. Anything or anyone associated with Iran must be under immediate suspicion. This is not racism. Just look at the Word Corruption Index.

    Iran comes in at 144 out of 175 – and equal with Nigeria and the Central African Republic and believe it or not below such corrupt places as Pakistan, Gambia and Azerbaijan. Is it any wonder that any UK bank would get nervous. Just look at the size of previous fines for unsatisfactory due diligence in this respect.

    It is just a wonder that UK banks will have anything to do with anyone associated with counties below 50 in the index.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm