View more on these topics

Ray Boulger: Time to scrap separate equity release authorisation

The introduction of new hybrid interest-only/lifetime mortgages means independent mortgage brokers should be able and authorised to advise on all types of mortgage.

Many brokers outsource the placing and advice of certain types of mortgage, such as lifetime and second charges, to specialist brokers. However, the original broker still needs enough expertise to identify situations when such solutions may be appropriate.

Outsourcing may be for commercial reasons, perhaps because a broker does not have enough business of a certain type to justify expending the time necessary to become competent in it. However, regulation will often be a factor, particularly in respect of lifetime mortgages, as an additional authorization is required to advise on this type of mortgage.

With the launch by Hodge in July of a hybrid mortgage which, from a regulatory perspective, is a lifetime mortgage, the differential between lifetime and other mortgages has become blurred. This mortgage is interest-only with sale of the property as the repayment strategy and a maximum LTV of 50 per cent. It is available to borrowers between ages 55 and 70, with affordability calculated by reference to pension income. 

The initial interest rate is a five-year fix at 4.75 per cent and this innovative mortgage starts to fill the gap left by the failure of mainstream lenders to offer ultra low-risk, low-LTV, affordable interest-only mortgages to older borrowers who have a guaranteed income for life.

Until the age of 80 (for the younger borrower if a couple) this is a normal interest-only mortgage but from that age it offers the option to roll up interest as on a lifetime mortgage. Hence its regulatory status.

Because of the onerous interest only criteria imposed by most of the mainstream lenders which still offer interest only, this hybrid mortgage will be one of the very few choices for some borrowers coming to the end of an existing interest-only mortgage who want, or need, to extend their borrowing and can afford to do so.

However, even though for between 10 and 25 years this mortgage is very similar to any other five year fixed rate interest only mortgage with a robust repayment strategy, most mortgage brokers will not be able to recommend it because they have chosen not to obtain the additional regulatory registration required to offer lifetime mortgages.

Such brokers can, and hopefully will, refer any clients for whom this type of mortgage might be suitable to a broker authorized to offer lifetime mortgages. However, some brokers will not be familiar with products they are not authorized to sell, let alone their detail.

As a result some clients are likely either to be recommended a less suitable and/or more expensive alternative or advised that no suitable mortgage is available to them.

It is unlikely the Hodge mortgage will be the last hybrid scheme and I believe it is now imperative for the FCA to reconsider the need for brokers to require a separate registration to sell lifetime mortgages. Consumers, who after all are the very people regulation is designed to protect, will not understand an arbitrary distinction between lifetime, hybrid and other mortgages.

Brokers who wish to call themselves independent should be required to be competent to offer advice across the whole range of mortgages, which also now includes shared equity, and only require a single authorisation to do so. Clearly, some transitional arrangements would be needed to ensure competence until a new exam syllabus is agreed.

 Ray Boulger is senior technical manager at John Charcol


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Well Ray as an Equity Release adviser who has business referred to him by mortgage advisers, I can tell you that most mortgage advisers will only start to understand the difference and the need for separation when the complaints start to arrive.

  2. Equity release is a specialist area requiring additional exams and training. No way should mortgage advisers be authorised for ER without this additional training

  3. I’ve got the qualification so I can advise AGAINST doing equity release until it is needed. As a result I’ve done about 4 in the lats 10 years!
    It’s not difficult to get the qualification, so why more mortgage advisers don’t take it, I don’t know. Removing it is a qualification requirement is wrong, but I can see a reason for building it in to the mortgage qualification for new mortgage advisers and requiring those who don’t have it yet to do extra CPD.

Leave a comment