View more on these topics

Rachel Reeves: Chancellor must choose flat-rate tax relief

Labour-Supporters-Conference-2012-700x450.jpg

Former shadow work and pensions secretary Rachel Reeves has lent her support to a flat-rate of 33 per cent tax relief on pension contributions.

Reeves, who now sits on the Treasury Select Committee, describes the current rules as “unjust and ill-judged” for giving higher earners more relief than those on lower incomes.

“The Chancellor should set a flat rate of pension tax relief,” Reeves wrote in a letter in today’s Times.

“It would be simple, fairer and an important step towards boosting retirement savings. Figures of between 20 and 33 per cent for this rate have been floated.

“I believe it should be 33 per cent. This would be a welcome boost for basic rate taxpayers and a cut in the savings subsidy for higher earners, while still rewarding savings.

“Then, tax relief could be rebranded as a government-backed saving scheme. For every £2 that savers put towards their pensions, the government would contribute another £1 – a huge incentive to save for everyone.”

Separately, The Times reports that work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith has given his blessing to proposals to radically overhaul taxation, moving to a system where pensions are taxed in line with ISAs.

According to the Times, Duncan Smith discussed options for reform with the Chancellor on Tuesday, and made it clear he would not oppose a pensions ISA.

It comes despite pensions minister Baroness Ros Altmann’s vocal opposition to the proposals, which she told Money Marketing would be: “a big mistake”.

Osborne is expected to announce his proposals for reform as part of the Budget on March 16.

Recommended

9

Rewriting the freedoms: Labour eyes regulation to strangle Osborne’s pension reforms

Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour party looks set to roll back key facets of the pension freedoms if it wins power in the 2020 general election. This week saw the long-awaited arrival of the Independent Review of Retirement Income from Cass Business School’s Professor David Blake, commissioned by former Labour shadow work and pensions secretary Rachel Reeves almost […]

Labour-Supporters-Conference-2012-700x450.jpg
5

Labour sets out plans to toughen up pension freedoms

A long-awaited Labour report into pension freedoms has proposed a raft of new measures to protect consumers, including new “safe harbour” decumulation products. The report, commissioned by the shadow work and pensions secretary Rachel Reeves in 2014, will form the basis of Labour’s pension policy. Written by Cass Business School’s Professor David Blake, it targets […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would lover to hear your opinion too.

  1. Silly woman.

    High earners pay more tax (even after pension contributions). When the finally retire they again pay more tax than those on BRT. So why shouldn’t they get higher tax relief. It’s not difficult – just have a flat rate of tax for all. I believe this applies in Latvia and seems to be a way of significantly increasing the overall tax trawl. Also with more money in pockets our economy (which relies on shopping) will probably be helped as well.

    Until Orrible Osborne came along at least there was one party that (Almost) understood this.

  2. Every discussion I’ve seen on this subject refers to ‘tax relief’ and the fairness of various rates whereas it appears simpler to me to refer to it simply as a contribution ‘before-tax’ with no mention of reliefs or rates.

    Harry, I’ve often thought that a flat rate of tax would remove all arguments about squeezing the rich ‘because they can afford it’ but what would that single flat rate actually be for a comparable tax take?
    (I’m guessing that current basic-rate payers would sh*t a brick whatever it is)

  3. I tell you what, if she gives up her MP pension, then maybe she’d have a point, but as she will not, she can get stuffed.

Leave a comment