View more on these topics

Public sector workers to benefit from ‘individual’ pension protection

HMRC-Building-700x450.jpg

High-paid public sector workers are likely to be the main beneficiaries of new “individual” pension protection rules, according to industry experts.

Last week, HMRC published details of protections it wants to put in place for people affected by the Government’s decision to cut the lifetime allowance for tax-free pension saving from £1.5m to £1.25m from April 2014.

The Revenue plans to introduce two new protection regimes – fixed protection and individual protection – to ease the transition to the new savings limit.

The proposed fixed protection rules will allow individuals to lock-in to a lifetime allowance of £1.5m, provided they do not make any further pension contributions. Investors will need to apply for the new protection before 6 April 2014.

Under the individual protection regime, savers will be able to apply for a personalised lifetime allowance, up to a maximum of £1.5m, based on the value of their pension pot at 5 April 2014. Investors will have three years to apply for individual protection from 6 April 2014.

Anyone who takes out individual protection will still be able to contribute to their pension. However, if their pension fund is worth more than the amount they locked into at 5 April 2014 when they crystallise, the excess will be subject to lifetime allowance charges of up to 55 per cent.

Aviva corporate benefits head of policy John Lawson says: “If you are in a money purchase scheme then every additional pound you pay in will be taxed at 55 per cent, presuming the value of your pot doesn’t fall significantly during that period.

“In most situations in the private sector you would not want to continue accruing benefit because, if you have got a pension pot worth over £1.25m, you will be a senior employee and you can probably get your employer to offer a cash alternative to the pension should you leave the scheme.

“A public sector employer, on the other hand, will not offer you a cash alternative and because it’s a DB scheme the contribution from your employer could be worth as much as 30 per cent of your income. 

“So in that situation opting out of the scheme is less attractive because even though the tax is high, so is the benefit you are accruing.”

A J Bell technical resources manager Gareth James says: “It is true to say that high-earning public sector workers will be more likely to benefit from individual protection than private sector workers.

“There is generally less flexibility in private sector packages than public sector. Individual protection allows them to continue building up pension, albeit subject to a tax charge, rather than getting nothing at all.”

Recommended

Axa Elevate parent posts £30m loss

Axa Portfolio Services, the parent company of the Axa Elevate platform, has posted a £30m pre-tax loss for 2012 after spending £12.7m on platform development. APS is also the parent company of Axa’s direct platform, Axa Self Investor, and administrates Axa’s pension schemes and Isas. The losses are a slight improvement on 2011 when the […]

Dean buys Rio Tinto and Barclays for Cazenove UK Opportunities

Julie Dean has started a position in Rio Tinto and added to Barclays in her £1.8bn Cazenove UK Opportunities fund as she maintains a pro-cyclical business cycle tilt. Dean initiated a holding in the metals and mining corporation during May as its shares now trade at a 10 per cent yield premium to the market […]

2

Banking commission: Regulators must be made more accountable to TSC

The parliamentary commission on banking standards is calling for financial regulators to be more accountable to the Treasury select committee. In the commission’s final report, published this week, it says regulators too often get involved in “turf wars” and try to avoid blame for their decisions. It calls for the Bank of England, Prudential Regulation […]

Tesco Bank lends to 85% LTV for the first time

Tesco Bank will now lend to 85 per cent loan-to-value after it launched a new range of products for borrowers with a 15 per cent deposit. It has launched a two-year fixed rate at 3.29 per cent, a three-year fixed rate at 3.59 per cent and a five-year fixed rate at 3.69 per cent. These […]

Help, I’ve been appointed as a trustee. What are my responsibilities?

Graeme Robb, Technical Manager at Prudential looks at the key duties and responsibilities of a trustee.  This article will consider the following: Duties to be performed on appointment Investment duties Protecting the interests of beneficiaries Keeping accounts and records Distributing property to beneficiaries Duties to be performed on appointment Obtain a copy of the trust […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. There’s something to be said for non-contributory Public sector DB scheme members to not be able to enjoy any protection at all and thus claw back some of the value embedded in those benefits.

    I’ve never understood the rationale of the lifetime allowance being related to the size of the fund rather than the total amount of tax relief that a member has enjoyed.

  2. A feature of many public sector schemes is that the schemes are unfunded or else that the scheme deficit is topped up from time to time by the state or other public body,
    This provides opportunities for tax avoidance by beneficiaries, since the cost is disassociated from the individual pensioner. This is particularly so when the beneficiary would be a higher rate taxpayer should this benefit be accurately recognised and assessed.

  3. It is interesting to note that under the old regime, Mr Sants and Lord Turner opted out of the FSA pension, presumably as they had already accumulated enough to need protection and would be caught by a tax charge.
    So the FSA paid them in salary instead!
    So whilst public sector schemes will not offer a cash alternative, it appears that funded DB schemes aping public sector, can offer a cash alternative. So these now departed individuals took the best of both worlds. The difference? Taxation pays for a public sector scheme and a government is looking to reduce the cost to the taxpayer of these gold plated schemes. However the regulated pay for the FSA and FCA scheme, and, as no-one can object for fear of regulatory reprisals, they can do pretty well what they like, although the remuneration committee has the final say. But if you were on that committee, what would you do?

  4. “There is generally less flexibility in private sector packages than public sector. Individual protection allows them to continue building up pension, albeit subject to a tax charge, rather than getting nothing at all.”
    Am I misreading this?

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com