View more on these topics

Pru rules out compensation to annuitants

Prudential has refused to compensate thousands of pensioners who face a higher tax bill this year because it gave HM Revenue & Customs the wrong tax codes.

The insurer admits it submitted the wrong PAYE codes for 2006-07, meaning 5,500 higher-rate taxpaying male annuitants underpaid income tax on their monthly payments.

Pru has written to the annuitants warning them that they will have to pay an extra 2.2m in total to make up for the underpayments. This equates to about 33 extra a month for each annuitant during the coming tax year.

It has ruled out compensating the pensioners as it says no one has suffered a financial loss.

A spokesman says: “We have written apologising for the stress and inconvenience this matter has caused as a result of insufficient tax deductions being made from pension payments. The issue arose due to human error in compiling the information we sent to HMRC. We are unable to make any payment towards the tax that has been underpaid as the taxable individual must pay all tax due.”

Jamieson Financial Management principal Bruce Jamieson says: “This is absolutely disgraceful. The Pru should settle the difference and take the hit on the chin.”

Recommended

Sipp storm brewing

Sipp regulation has dominated the world of pensions this week, something Gordon Brown must be pleased about.

FSA warns senior managers after £30k fine

The Financial Services Authority has fined the ex-finance director of a former ING subsidiary £30,000 for breaches of FSA principles by “failing to exercise due skill, care and diligence in carrying out his role”.

Abbey’s steep step shocks advisers

Abbey has been accused of creating a huge payment shock for borrowers after launching a stepped-rate deal that starts at 2.99 per cent for the first year.After one year, the five-year mortgage offer shoots up to 6.2 per cent for two years and climbs again in years four and five to 6.35 per cent. It […]

Compromise is wise way for the FSA

The FSA has changed its mind about plans to regulate investment trusts which might have seen a repeat of the split-cap debacle.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment