View more on these topics

Profile: Tony Langham – ‘Advisers and the Money Advice Service need each other’

Lansons chief executive urges more money to be spent on lobbying on behalf of advisers 


Twenty-five years ago Tony Langham and his partner, Clare Parsons, decided to create their own financial services public relations firm. Starting with just an American Express credit card and a 100 per cent mortgage, they gradually built Lansons into a powerhouse in the sector with a string of high-profile clients.

Lansons has managed the PR and reputations of some of the biggest names in the industry, from major banks to advisers.

In the 1990s it was instrumental in launching consumer brands into financial services, including the Post Office, Marks & Spencer and Tesco.

In 2010 the agency worked with Metro Bank to launch the first new bank for 100 years, accompanied by much fanfare and press attention.

Recently it has been working with Invesco to manage its reputation in the wake of Neil Woodford’s departure to start his own fund.

Perhaps more challenging still has been Lansons’ work with the Co-operative Bank as it manages the fallout from its £1.5bn capital shortfall and the scandal of chairman Reverend Paul Flowers’ arrest on drugs charges.

The firm has also worked with Skandia and Jupiter through  good and bad times alike. 

Over 25 years, Langham and Parsons have transformed Lansons into the go-to agency for many bank chief executives, fund managers and insurers seeking to protect or enhance their reputations.

Mail on Sunday personal finance editor Jeff Prestridge, who has worked in the same field as Langham for 25 years, says: “When it comes to PR, Tony is fiercely protective of his clients and if you rough one up unfairly he does not hold back in letting you know what he thinks about you. Friendships disappear out of the window for a while.

“He’s a brilliant networker – hence the success of Lansons – and although he’s laid-back, you underestimate him at your peril. He doesn’t miss a trick.”

Langham left university in 1982 and spent six months running a betting shop before finding a job as a political marketer with Mori. He cut his teeth working on the doomed 1983 Labour election campaign, which resulted in the party’s biggest defeat under left-wing leader Michael Foot.

He also worked with Mori on the privatisation of British Telecom before moving into PR towards the end of the decade.

Employed at Dewe Rogerson, later Citigate DR, Langham met Parsons, who became his partner. Eventually becoming frustrated at not being offered an equity stake in the company, he left at the age of 28.

Langham has not forgotten that frustration and, alongside Parsons, has given away 40 per cent of Lansons in equity stakes to staff.

Since 1989 the firm has evolved from a PR agency into a reputation management company that works with firms internally as well as doing lobbying and media work.

In the early days, however, the focus was on acquiring PR clients and linking the City with consumer personal finance.

Langham says: “There were growth markets at the time in centralised mortgages, life assurance, pensions and changes around advice, with IFAs just being established. We used our knowledge to build business in those areas.”

The creation of IFAs in the late 1980s was a major part of Lansons’ early success and the firm won the account for IFA Promotion, later, in 1992.

As part of his pitch, Langham devised a “wasted tax” campaign to demonstrate how much money people unnecessarily paid in tax, which could be avoided with better financial planning.

Twenty-two years later,  Unbiased remains a client. Indeed, Langham is now Unbiased chairman and has worked with five chief executives.

He has observed the advice market change greatly over two decades and has concerns about how the industry presents itself today.

First, Langham believes not nearly enough money is spent lobbying on behalf of advisers. For example, the Unbiased budget for the purpose is 33 per cent smaller than it was in 1992. He says: “Promotion costs money and lobbying costs money. Just look at the numbers: the Money Advice Service has levied £80m from the industry. 

“The other form of lobbying is to persuade people with money to give representation to what good financial advisers do.

“A good focus is to not be in conflict with the MAS and Citizens Advice and others with money. Lobbying isn’t adversarial; it’s collective and persuasive. The worry is that with the regulator and other organisations, the sector tends to cause too much friction.

“It comes from what is fantastic about the advice industry. It is so resilient and I have lived through so many predictions about the decline of the sector. It is full of independent individuals but its strength is also its weakness.”

A recent example of conflict in the sector was the storm created when MAS chief executive Caroline Rookes said she was “worried” about the ethics of advisers.

At the Labour party conference in September, Langham was the person who directly asked Rookes if she had concerns about ethics after the issue was raised in discussion.

He says: “The whole thing has illustrated the bad place we are at with advisers and the MAS. Both need each other. The whole-of-market financial advice sector needs the MAS spending £80m on basic and neutral information and the MAS can’t do everything – it needs a fantastic adviser network.

“It was not constructive for the MAS to make a big point about the ethics of advisers but the reaction from advisers was too extreme because both sides need each other.”

More adviser fury occurs whenever “advice” is used to describe anything unregulated, such as the MAS or Chancellor George Osborne’s initial branding of the pensions guidance regime.

Langham acknowledges the problem and says there are, in reality, four big advice brands in the UK – Coutts,  Hargreaves Lansdown, Martin Lewis and St James’s Place.

He says: “Regulated advice has a meaning for business but what the public mean by advice isn’t what we currently mean. It is a big problem.”

But instead of delving into the minutiae of what “advice” means, says Langham, advisers should be lobbying for more demand-side reforms to boost consumer savings and take-up of insurance products.


2013-present: Vice-chairman, PRCA PR Council; due to become chairman in December

2011-present: Non-executive chairman,

1989-present: Co-founder and chief executive, Lansons

1984-89: Dewe Rogerson, becoming joint head of financial services PR

1982-84: Mori, political, financial and social market research

Five Questions

What’s the best bit of advice you’ve received in your career?

What goes around comes around.

What keeps you awake at night?

Our poodle, Fudge.

What has had the most significant impact on financial advice in the past year?

The changes to pensions and annuities announced in the Budget.

If I was put in charge of the FCA for a day I would…

Make sure regulatory principle 4 is being considered adequately: “Consumers should take responsibility for their decisions”; look at statutory objective 1: “Secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers”; and ask if we’re protecting people against the risks of not saving enough and the risks of under-insurance.

Any advice for new advisers?

Learn marketing and tech skills too – the time is right for more national adviser brands to emerge.


MM Wired 1

MM Wired: Charging for auto-enrolment advice

Was the Government right to introduce a 0.75 per cent charge cap? Should the Government go further? Will the charge cap protect members from poor outcomes? What is the role of good governance in protecting scheme members? Panellists: Moderator: Natalie Holt, Editor, Money Marketing Tom McPhail, Head of Pensions Research, Hargreaves Lansdown Tim Sharp, Pensions […]


Stephen Womack: Life offices are clinging to the past

History was one of my favourite subjects at school. I continue to love the insight it can give into how decisions taken generations ago are still shaping our world today. My sixth-form course allowed us to choose a particular period for in-depth study and I spent months learning about the Soviet Union under the iron […]

David Gauke MP

Treasury dismisses Steve Webb plan to ‘unwind’ annuities

The Treasury has dismissed pensions minister Steve Webb’s plan to “unwind annuities” claiming it cannot rip up existing contracts. At the Taxation of Pensions Bill committee hearing last week, Treasury financial secretary David Gauke said there has to be a cut off point for people accessing new freedoms, opening up a clear rift with his […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I don’t need the MAS. Now my business is mature, most of my revenue is recurring, I have a couple of professional connections, I receive a few referrals every year from existing clients and my only advertising spend is on our ad’s in Yellow Pages and on There are umpteen local adviser directories online.

    Aside from the fact that no consultation was offered to intermediaries on its creation and what its remit was going to be, the MAS, though funded by independent intermediaries, is manifestly NOT independent intermediary-centric. We’ve read reports of MAS staff at road shows slagging off independent intermediaries as commission-hungry rip-off merchants, Caroline Rookes has said she has doubts about our ethics, the number of intermediaries who’ve received referrals from the MAS is vanishingly small and various bodies, notably MP’s, have declared the MAS to be unfit for purpose. Then, of course, there was the scandal over Tony Hobman’s vast salary. The MAS has done virtually NOTHING for those forced to fund its very existence. And now it’s been deemed not even to be capable of participating in delivery of the government’s At Retirement Guidance Guarantee. All this adds up to is a decidedly sorry and wasteful track record thus far.

    Let’s face it, the MAS is just another privately funded quango to take away a slice of what the CAB has done for decades. Why should I be forced to fund a body that provides debt counselling, an issue totally unrelated to anything that I do.

    Were the MAS to be scrapped next week, the only difference it would make to me would be a modest saving on the already excessive package of levies I have to pay. No, I don’t need the MAS. Flush it away to where it belongs and have done with it.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm