View more on these topics

‘Professional body would kill networks’

Introducing a professional body to maintain standards would wipe out the role of the network, according to Whitechurch managing director Ian McIver.

He says a professional body that can “hire and fire” advisers also undermines the regulator.

McIver says while many commentators claim a professional body is required to preserve standards, as with accountants and lawyers, these professions differ from financial services because of the existence of the FSA.

He says the accountancy and legal professions do not have a central regulator that acts in the same way as the FSA, which is why they turn to their professional bodies, the ICAEW and the Law Society, to rule their members.

He says: “I do not like everyone talking about the need for a professional body in order to give this industry teeth. I think it is the role of the network, or your employer, to have those teeth, carrying out the hiring and firing of its advisers if they are, or are not, up to scratch.

“I think there is a role for the professional body in relation to ethics and examinations but not to determine who keeps their licence to trade or not.”

Recommended

First footing

The shrinking number of mortgage products on the market has brought problems for first-time buyers.

Loyalty for life

The last month has seen Sainsbury’s and Tesco running promotions through their loyalty programmes to promote their life insur-ance but the move has been criticised by some advisers as a gimmick.

Rayner Spencer Mills: Why we rate the Artemis US Select Fund

Ken Rayner and Graham O¹Neill from RSM explain why they rate the fund, its investment process and how it can be used in a portfolio The Artemis US Select Fund became a RSM ‘rated’ fund earlier this year. In this video, Ken Rayner and Graham O’Neill explain the fund’s investment approach, why they rate it, […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment