View more on these topics

Problems ahead for annuitisation reforms


With just over four months before the planned introduction of the Treasury’s new rules removing the requirement to annuitise, the industry remains in the dark as to just how it intends to introduce these significant changes.

Draft legislation is expected to be published on December 9, clarifying the Government’s key proposals to abolish the disliked alternatively secured pension. The current framework is to be replaced by a capped drawdown system that remains consistent through retirement and a flexible drawdown option allow funds to be withdrawn where individuals satisfy a yet to be formulated minimum income requirement.

The original consultation document, written barely 10 weeks after the coalition was formed, raises as many questions for advisers as answers, and achieving a workable minimum income requirement structure is one of the tougher nuts that policymakers need to crack.

Evolve Financial Planning director Jason Witcombe says: “The MIR needs to be more flexible than has been suggested in the consultation document. They are talking about only allowing index-linked pensions to count towards what keeps an individual off benefits but lots of people take out level pensions that are more than sufficient to keep them off the state. They need to set a higher level for level pensions or incorporate in the rules a facility for people with a certain fund value to be able to take advantage of this option.”

Witcombe’s perspective echoes the submission to the consultation put in by The Actuarial Profession, which proposed that pensions without LPI indexation should be included at 75 per cent of value, reducing the risk of creating an unnatural demand for index-linked annuities over level ones.

Standard Life head of pension policy John Lawson is hoping the Treasury will drop the idea of flexible drawdown altogether. He says: “The Treasury has received a big message back that there is no consumer demand for flexible drawdown at all. It is riddled with tax complexities and the tax charges mean it is not attractive even to the tiny minority of people who may be eligible for it.”

Instead, Lawson wants to see a greater flexibility over using funds in capped drawdown to pay for long-term care costs, addressing a cost to the state he warns is set to soar over the coming decade.

He would also like to see more creativity on shorter-term annuities, given people’s varying income needs through retirement.

He adds: “For example, it would be good to be able to get an annuity to bridge the gap until your state pension kicks in, in the same way that happens with defined-benefit schemes.” On the other hand, Burrows & Cummins director Billy Burrows is confident that flexible drawdown will come in although he agrees it will prove a red herring for most.

He says: “Of more interest is capped drawdown. If it is set at a sensible level, we could well see a new wave of Middle Britain clients deciding to go into drawdown. That would in turn lead to a raft of new lower-range drawdown products. We could see more interest in fixed-term annuities and those with investment linking, and a general trend towards people buying annuities at a later age than at present.”

The other key change that Burrows wants to see brought through into the legislation is the ability for providers to allow value protection after age 75.
Broader changes to the annuitisation process and the operation of the open market option may take longer to introduce as, while the issue was raised, there were no formal proposals put forward in the consultation document.

But there is a growing feeling that even the changes on flexible and capped drawdown may not make it on to the statute book by April 2011.

Burrows says: “There is a huge school of thought that says these changes are not going to happen this year at all.”

Suffolk Life marketing director John Moret says that even if the changes make it in to legislation by next April, he is concerned that many pension providers will be unable to deal with the numbers of people who want to take advantage of the new rules.

The Treasury consultation document predicts that only 8,000 people a year will want to use flexible drawdown to take their retirement income but Moret says the figure is likely to be much higher.

He says: “In their impact assessment linked to their consultation document, the Treasury estimated that around 8,000 individuals a year would use flexible drawdown, although this was dependent on the level of the MIR. This estimate appears to be some distance away from what the market believes. The precise details of flexible drawdown have yet to be finalised but over 90 per cent of advisers told us they have clients who would want to use flexible drawdown.

“Industry statistics suggest that the number of new drawdown cases in 2010 is likely to exceed 40,000 and a significant number of these are likely to be potential users of flexible drawdown. In addition, there are over 300,000 current users of drawdown, many of whom will also find flexible drawdown appealing. This suggests that the initial take-up of flexible drawdown could well be as high as 50,000 and that the annual take up will be well in excess of the Treasury estimate.”

If the level of demand is anything like he predicts, Moret says regardless of the detail in December’s announcement the run up to April 2011 and immediately after is likely to be a busy time for advisers and pension providers.

“With each week that passes whilst we wait to learn the detail of the new regime the pressure increases on providers and advisers to accommodate these changes in time for their proposed introduction in April 2011. This is at a time when providers are also having to cope with the pensions tax changes already announced and advisers are increasingly focused on 2012 and the RDR changes – not to mention the other proposed pension changes such as a new state pension and the launch of Nest and auto-enrolment.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. IMHO, the best form of annuity reform would be to remove altogether the shackle of annuity rates.

    If simplification and restoration of public confidence in saving for retirement are the government’s top priorities (as it claims), then retaining the shackle of annuity rates along with a punitive tax charge on unspent funds remaining in the wake of death in retirement aren’t going to achieve either.

    What is needed is a vastly simplified Income DrawDown product (a Pension Income Bond) that aims to spend the whole of the retiree’s accumulated fund over the remainder of his anticipated lifetime, allowing for a sensible estimate of future investment growth, with an insurance element against early fund burnout due to lower than hoped-for investment performance or unexpected longevity.

    With annuity rates due to decline still further, the need for the creation of an alternative retirement income mechanism has never been more pressing. Why can’t government see this and act acordingly?

  2. You something that allows for future growth, with insurance against low performance or unexpected longevity.

    In other words – an annuity rate.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm