View more on these topics

Principles mean FSA covers its own back

I refer to a recent thought- provoking article in Money Marketing on treating customers fairly.

In principle, I agree with it whole-heartedly, not only with regard to TCF but with all matters that one should engage closely in with the regulator.

However, I think there are two points that may have been overlooked. The first is that I would welcome a visit, provided it was in the spirit of guidance and not censure.

Indeed, I well remember when starting Norwest Consultants in 1990 that I rang Fimbra and asked them to come in for an inspection, much to their amazement.

Quite simply, this was harking back to my pre- vious experience of factory inspectors and based on the principle that it is better to find out as early as possible what it is that you are doing wrong rather than allow bad practices or erroneous systems to get entrenched.

The problem is that the regulator seems to have engendered the impression that the inspections will be censorious rather than offering guidance, which is a pity.

The second point rather flows from the first although we can follow the principle many of us feel that TCF is not explicit enough and we are suspicious of this particular initiative which is designed (so many believe) more for the benefit of the regulator than for anyone else.

What worries us is that in future we could be proved to be in breach of being unfair, notwithstanding that the clients may be satisfied.

The problem is that TCF will, in the last resort, be an opinion rather than a matter of fact and that, in my view, is not a way to regulate.

You need to regulate by fact and if you are going to regulate by fact, then there is no reason at all why this can’t be enshrined in proper written rules.

On the one hand, the adviser community smarts from what has taken place in the past – the pension review, contracting out, endowments, zero-dividend preference shares, Scarps and so on. We worry that this will be regulation by edict and made up as it goes along.

This may be unjustified but I am sure you will agree – somewhat understandable. It is not over-cynical to postulate that the regulator formulates policy merely to protect its own back. This is also understandable. The last thing the regulator wants is to be blamed for anything going wrong and therefore principles rather than rules will allow it to be right on more occasions than not.

I also agree that it is difficult to square the circle. Fimbra was criticised because Godfrey Jillings and his staff were seen to be too close and comfortable with those whom they regulated.

I would contend that the best regulation is by consensus and really ought not to be adversarial and I think that in the current environment both parties are to blame.

I think it is both admir- able and desirable that publications such as Money Marketing highlight these concerns and hopefully there will be more of us to work towards a more conciliatory and co-operative approach to the whole matter.

Harry Katz
Norwest Consultants
Stanmore
Middlesex

Recommended

Concern over Bright Grey’s online system

Insurance application outsourcing firm MorganAsh says it is worried over the quality of Bright Grey’s online application system after the provider admitted that large numbers of applicants are having to make material changes to their forms.

Price falls mask the bigger picture

Earlier in the month, the Intern- ational Monetary Fund predicted that UK growth will slow from 3 per cent in 2007 to 1.6 per cent in both 2008 and 2009.

Floor plan

Advertisements for commercial property funds have been conspicuous by their absence in recent times. It is not surprising, given the pasting that many funds been handed out over the past year.

Global income: preparing for a rate rise…

In the five years since we launched the Artemis Global Income Fund, its manager Jacob de Tusch-Lec has built a distinctive portfolio that is first among its peers. Here he explains why his “quality, cyclical and value yield” stocks, and flexible approach, leave the fund better placed to benefit from uncertainty than funds that depend […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com