View more on these topics

‘Priips delay is not enough’ says MEP

pan_9416

Delaying Priips by one year to 2018 might not be enough to guarantee clarity on its drafted regulatory technical standards, says Syed Kamall, the European Conservatives and Reformists chairman and London MEP.

Kamall, who is among the leaders of the objection process on the re-draft of the RTS within the legislation, told Money Marketing sister title Fund Strategy: “A delay in Priips legislation would hopefully mean certainty for Priips providers, financial advisers and most importantly investors.

“This cannot be achieved by simply delaying the implementation of this legislation but by making vital, accurate changes to the RTS as currently drafted.

“The Parliament was very direct during its scrutiny period, outlining the flaws in the original drafting and providing the Commission with clear indications as to our main concerns.”

Fund Strategy revealed in October the European Commission has decided to delay the introduction of regulation for Priips by one year to 2018.

The Commission is understood to have announced a 12-month delay of the rules in a meeting with a Council Working Group and is expected to publicly reveal its decision this Wednesday, 9 November.

The news follows the European Parliament vote in September to reject the European Commission’s draft RTS on Priips related to the presentation and content of the Key Information Documents.

MEPs, echoing many fund groups, called the standards “so flawed and misleading that it could actually lose [retail investors] money”.

Among the main objections to the Commission’s draft rules were the lack of provision of information about past performance of funds in the KID and the question of whether the current proposals put different providers of Priip products on an unequal footing.

At the time of the vote, Kamall said MEPs were not rejecting the principles behind the “rushed regulation” but are urging for more clarity and accuracy on the guidance.

He says: “The work we have done recently on this legislation was not about guaranteeing a delay. We wanted to highlight the issues with the content of these RTS, not simply the timeframe given to make these changes.

“Nevertheless, I would hope that the Commission considers the practicalities and needs of the industry affected. The most important thing is that investors get an accurate and reliable product, an aim that should supersede all desire to meet a deadline.”

The delay to Priips until January 2018 means it will align with Mifid II, which was also recently delayed by one year to allow firms to build data reporting systems.

Kamall says a “domino effect” when it comes to EU legislations’ changes and delays after the financial crisis is not something new.

He says: “With so much EU legislation post-crisis, we often find ourselves part of an almost ‘domino effect’ where when one piece of legislation is agreed, it becomes clear that another will have to be amended in order to ensure compatibility or remove new inconsistencies. with that in mind I am always in favour a considering a more horizontal approach to regulation.”

Recommended

EU-Euro-Europe-Eurozone-700x450.jpg
1

EU to delay Priips regulation until 2018

The European Commission has decided to delay the introduction of its Priips regulation by one year, Money Marketing understands. The European Commission is understood to have announced a 12-month delay of the directive today in a meeting with a Council Working Group. The Commission will publicly announce the decision on 9 November, despite previously announcing […]

Fears grow over how EU will redraft Priips rules

The investment industry has been bought some time to comply with new European disclosure rules, but there remains a lack of clarity around how the rules will be redrafted and the ultimate impact on investment advice. Money Marketing revealed last week the European Commission has decided to delay the introduction of regulation for Priips, or […]

UK policy: Kate Moss and short-termism

“Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels,” said supermodel Kate Moss, who is not often credited for her insights into policy making. Perhaps she should be. In politics, as in matters of diet, the course of action that is the best over the long term is often not the most desirable course of action in the short term. Add the instant gratification of the democratic electoral cycle and, instead of good policy making, you sometimes get the equivalent to a midnight binge in front of the fridge.

Read more


Important information

Investment risks

The value of an investment and any income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Forecasts and past performance are not a guide to future performance. Some information and statistical data herein has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable but in no way are warranted by us as to their accuracy or completeness. These are Neptune’s views and as such this document is deemed to be impartial research. We do not undertake to advise you of any change to our views.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Leave a comment