View more on these topics

Pressure mounts on Pensions Regulator over BHS collapse

Lesley Titcombe

Pressure is mounting on the Pensions Regulator after it emerged it only realised BHS was on the brink of collapse after reading about it in the newspapers.

Chief executive Lesley Titcomb was grilled by MPs yesterday at a special evidence session held jointly by the Work and Pensions and Business committees, according to the BBC.

She revealed TPR had first been in discussions with BHS over its pensions deficit – now valued at £571m – in 2009.

MP Richard Fuller said the pensions watchdog “did not sound like much of a regulator”.

Titcomb said the regulator opened an anti-avoidance case to determine whether the previous owners should be pursued to make up the shortfall when the Retail Acquisitions takeover was announced.

The scheme will now fall into the Pension Protection Fund, the lifeboat for defined benefit schemes. Chief executive Alan Rubenstein told MPs BHS’s trustees submitted a 23-year plan to clear the deficit, but that the average recovery period was nine years.

The PPF will take a £275m hit as result of taking on the fund, he said.

Top Shop owner Sir Philip Green is due to give evidence at a later date and has stoked further controversary by calling for DWP committee chair Frank Field to step down.

Prior to the inquiry Field said Green should be stripped of his knighthood and be made to fill in the pension scheme’s deficit.

In reply, Green said: “Clearly he has already made his decision as to what he feels the punishment should be without even hearing any evidence from anybody about BHS or the circumstances of the last 15 years.”

Recommended

Lesley Titcombe

Pensions Regulator whistleblowing surges by a third

The number of whistleblowing reports sent to The Pensions Regulator has soared by almost a third. A Freedom of Information request submitted by law firm Clyde & Co reveals TPR received 2,545 reports in 2015/16, up 29 per cent from 1,968 in 2014/15. Last month new data showed the number of escalating penalty notices issued […]

Looking at the bigger picture of workplace wellbeing

In the final week of our Workplace Wellbeing month, we look at the bigger picture of total wellbeing. Our recent Working Well survey shows that employers are increasingly seeing the importance of other areas of wellbeing – including fostering strong social ties and community involvement – to their employees living healthy and productive lives. We also noted a rapid rise in the number […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. While it is right that firms should honour obligations to staff, it is the very regulations that are a significant contributor to the problems. Firms find themselves in a strait jacket and unable to take a flexible approach. The normal process of remuneration negotiation is hampered. Times change and firms should be able to arrange their affairs to suit.

    We have moved from what was an arrangement between management and staff to a formulaic, authoritarian, inflexible system. One day it might just occur to the rule makers that firms are not benefit agencies. We see the results in as much as firms become insolvent as a result of the burdens imposed by outdated arrangements to which they have been tightly bound. What is better a job with a more modest pension, or no job and a protected cut down pension?

  2. Still a planned recovery of 23 years does seem excessive.

Leave a comment