View more on these topics

‘Pressure forces FOS into wrong decisions’

A whistleblowing ex-Financial Ombudsman Service adjudicator says the “immense pressure” being placed on FOS staff to hit targets is resulting in wrong decisions being made.

Former adjudicator Jane Sanders, who left the FOS in January after working there for 15 months, says the amount of work for adjudicators is affecting the quality of the decisions.

She says there are only a small number of FOS managers who supervise the adjudicator so many decisions are not being properly assessed before being sent out to firms and complainants.

Sanders says the adjudicators have strict rules to follow but it is difficult to enforce them in such a big organisation.

She quit the organisation because she was unhappy with the way the FOS handles its adjudication process. She says: “You cannot produce quality work in the volume they expect to a standard that is fair and just.

“The impetus is on each person to take responsibility for their own actions but once a decision has gone out to a firm or a complainant, it is gone. It is only if you find that mistake you can rectify it. If an adjudicator thinks that they are doing their job really well and their decision does not go through the quality checking that month, nobody would ever know.”

An FOS spokesman says: “Adjudicator decisions are not final and firms can refer cases to an ombudsman for consideration if they are not happy with the outcome.”

Facts & Figures Financial Planners Limited managing director Simon Webster says: “I am not surprised by these allegations. It is nice to have confirmed from the inside what many of us have suspected for years.”


Towergate buys Glasgow firm

Towergate has bought Glasgow insurance broker and financial advice firm MacDonald Reid Scott Group.


Case study: administration — managing group life schemes

Our client leads the global market in high-tech electronics manufacturing and digital media. The trustees of the company’s final salary pension scheme insure death-in-service lump sum and dependants’ pension death benefits for active employees, as well as dependants’ pension benefits for deferred members (those who have left service).


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Does anyone know of a way to enforce the decision made by an Adjudicator where both the complainant and the Firm agree and have confirmed in writing their acceptance of the decision – hence no need for a referral to the Ombudsman – yet where the Firm involved then sit on the matter and fail to comply with the agreement ? The Adjudicator meanwhile is desperate to refer the matter on as he does not wish to deal with this.

    Thank you

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm