View more on these topics

Pot luck

The significance of at-retirement planning is still lost on many people

It sometimes appears that those who would benefit most from independent advice at retirement receive least help. A prime example is when people with relatively modest pension pots reach retirement. Decisions taken at this time may have a significant effect on their standard of living for decades to come, yet most are funnelled into a lifetime annuity without considering the alternatives.

The open-market option was introduced in 1978. Low take-up led to a rethink of the rules in 2002 when providers became obliged to tell clients they might get a better deal by taking their pension savings elsewhere. The number of retirees exercising the option has remained stubbornly low, prompting a third review that is currently ongoing.

The review must find solutions to the problem that those who need to make best use of their pension savings are among the least likely to use an independent or whole-of-market adviser.

Whatever factors are dissuading people from seeking professional advice – whether it is lack of awareness of the financial significance of making an irreversible lifetime commitment, access to advisers or cost of advice – they are serious impediments restricting access to better retirement income decisions.

The RDR, in proposing a simplified advice regime, must be careful not to result in no improvements or to make the situation worse.

The limited commission available and retirees’ reluctance to pay additional fees mean that their financial needs are dealt with as quickly as possible and funnelled towards a self-select, tied or multi-tied lifetime annuity or simply left with the existing provider. The RDR proposals could reinforce this weakness. They make the mistake of assuming it is better to receive some advice rather than none, missing the point that what many retirees need is good advice on the whole range of options available on what may be the biggest single investment they ever make.

There is much else at fault in the retirement income market that the Omo review should consider. One point is that pension providers have a vested interest in keeping the pension money in house through the sale of a retirement income product such as a lifetime annuity, contrasting sharply with the client’s requirement to secure a higher income or a more flexible product. There need to be far stricter rules to put a clear separation between the provision of a pension plan and provision of an income product at retirement.

It would also be useful if the Omo review could look at enforcing tight time limits on providers for the transfer of funds to alternative providers. At present, this can take months because there is no compulsion for providers to hand over the cash. A 14-day limit should be imposed with a mandatory requirement for funds to be transferred electronically rather than by cheques in the post.

Another key opportunity would be to focus on the standardisation of pension provider letters to actively encourage retirees to seek advice and consider the whole market. Many of those letters that do comply with current Omo rules are still worded to implicitly encourage clients to roll over into an annuity rather than shop around or seek independent advice.

Retirees need to be made aware that their pension money should be invested with just as much thought as if it were cash in hand. It should be made clear that buying a lifetime annuity is not compulsory at retirement and many would benefit by keeping their options open, especially in the early years.

The widely held belief that retirees have no other option than to annuitise remains a major disincentive to the development of a market for alternative retirement products. Fixed-term annuities have a huge role to play because they effectively enforce an Omo at the end of each term, making the holder shop around for a new deal that suits them best and giving advisers the ability to continue servicing clients deeper into retirement.

It is only by age 75, roughly halfway through the average retirement, that lifetime annuities become more attractive because the benefit from mortality pooling is so much stronger and people have a far better idea of their future income needs.

About 65 per cent of pension money – more than £4bn a year – is rolled over into providers’ own lifetime annuities with little thought about alternatives. Few people in the industry believe these people get the best deal.

Peter Quinton is business development director at Living Time

Recommended

Time is needed to make fee move

JP Morgan Asset Management has raised concerns that IFAs may not be given the time and regulatory support to move to the fee-based model favoured by the retail distribution review.In its IFA survey, Surviving the storm, JPMAM says advisers need to be give sufficient time to make the transition and help should be made available […]

Royal Liver factsheet aims to end critical confusion

Progress by Royal Liver has produced a factsheet amid concerns that many advisers are judging criticalillness products based on their Defaqto rating rather than by comparing features.The factsheet outlines the conditions which result in most claims on Royal Liver’s CI policies. Cancer, heart attack, stroke, total permanent disability and multiple sclerosis top the list, with […]

MPs want talks on orphan assets

The Treasury select committee is calling on the Government to consult with the industry about including life insurance assets in its unclaimed assets scheme. The committee also wants the scheme to be made compulsory and to include assets held by National Savings & Investments.

Scale of current credit fears last seen after 9/11, says F&C

Volatility in the financial markets is at its greatest level since September 2001 with the market trading on fear, says F&C.F&C head of asset allocation Paul Niven says the market volatility that has followed the sub-prime lending “carnage” in America has been confirmed by the widespread losses for investors, particularly of hedge funds.He says current […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com