View more on these topics

Post-sale cash should go to the serving adviser

I refer to Roger Yates&#39 letter (Money Marketing, September 16) on the subject of renewal commission.

As someone who joined the industry in 1970 – before Lautro – I was always taught that renewal commission was paid as an incentive to agents to service the client&#39s ongoing needs and, as a result, hopefully produce further business for the agent and provider.

In recent years, the providers have missed the wood for the trees and adopted a different approach.

To a large extent, I agree with Mr Yates&#39 sentiment and try not to support providers who refuse to transfer serving/renewal commission in the event of my becoming the servicing adviser.

The problem is, however, that to follow that regime literally would lead to only a handful of companies being used and, by default, I would become a “multi-tied” agent. For example, Legal & General will transfer some cases but not others depending on who the selling “adviser” was.HSBC will not transfer servicing commission on bank-sold products. Many other household names either do not transfer for part or all their contracts.

However, it might be argued that fund-based renewals are not “renewals”as they are funded by taking lower initial payments. Or are they? Products paying fund-based renewals originally paid up-front commission in excess of the then “standard” single-premium commission as a means of recompensing for future servicing, that is, the renewal was paid in advance.

Compare the commission offered with annuity purchases. The additional amount was calculated based on the assumption that such products would be held for five to 10 years, after which the proceeds would be taken.

Fund-based payments are not therefore in lieu of initial commissions which should be protected but are advance payments of renewals. What I believe should (have) happen(ed) is that with the increase in rates, clawbacks should have been built in, covering both cancellation and change of servicing adviser during the first five years.

With the regulator looking more and more at post-sales issues, including servicing of existing clients, I believe that the industry needs to grasp the nettle and acknowledge that any post-sale payment such as renewal level or fund based commission should be paid to the serving adviser and not, as is currently the case, with many providers, to the original adviser.

Owen Hoye

OPH Financial Consultants,

Codsall,Staffordshire

Recommended

A&L chief in warning over loan network sizes

Many mortgage networks are not portraying their membership sizes accurately, according to Alliance & Leicester head of intermediary mortgages Mehrdad Yousefi. Yousefi says that with auth-orised representatives yet to make up their minds on whe-ther they will join a network or become directly authorised, there is a danger of networks not being able to validate […]

Norwich Union term and mortgage life insurance reprice

Norwich Union is repricing its term and mortgage life insurance as of October 4. Term assurance will on average decrease by 0.45 per cent. Mortgage life assurance – no options – will decrease on average by 1.67 per cent. Mortgage life insurance with guaranteed critical illness option will decrease on average by 3.8 per cent. […]

LibDems take a radical pension view

On September 7, the Liberal Democrats announced a comprehensive set of pension policy proposals for their annual conference. Even if you doubt whether the LibDems will win the general election this is important because the other parties have time to steal the best bits and incorporate them into their own pension policy for the general […]

The final insult on pension compensation

Ros Altmann was quoted in The Times recently as saying: “Inaccurate and woolly statements by Government agencies incorrectly led members to believe pension contributions were safe in their final salary schemes. The Government must compensate victims of this maladministration in full to right this terrible wrong;” If contributions were not safe in final-salary schemes, why […]

Scheme pays explained

By Fiona Hanrahan, senior product insight and technical support analyst We’ve received lots of queries on scheme pays and when it can be used. This article explains how it works and the conditions which apply. What is ‘scheme pays’? If an individual exceeds the annual allowance (AA) and an AA tax charge is due, they […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com