View more on these topics

Platforum: Segmentation is not a dirty word

Too many advisers are overlooking the benefits and those that are doing it aren’t in the most effective – and regulatory sound – way

A few years ago, we asked platforms to define their target markets.  Several came back with vague, catch-all statements such as “any clients with portfolios between £25,000 and £10m”. Hardly helpful.

The picture today is very different. As the market has matured, platforms have established their niches, serving different segments of advisers and their clients.

Those clients with relatively simple needs (often with smaller portfolios) might be suited to a low-cost platform with limited functionality. Those with more complicated needs are likely to require more bells and whistles, so a more extensive platform service might be appropriate.

Platforms are also now far more aligned to advisers’ investment propositions. A firm running in-house model portfolios on an advisory basis will likely require a very different platform service than a firm that runs discretionary portfolios using a mixture of funds and exchange-traded funds.

Platforum: The insidious retirement planning risks ahead for advisers

Platforms with the most clearly-defined propositions and target markets have generally seen the strongest growth in recent years. Examples include: Aviva focusing on clients with smaller portfolios, James Hay with its strong pension heritage, and Parmenion, which has specialised in discretionary management.

In contrast, we still find many advisers perceive “segmentation” to be a dirty word. This goes well beyond a healthy disdain for management jargon. Our strong impression is that advisers consider segmentation to be somehow at odds with their traditional approach to treating each client as a separate individual and it would be wrong to place in a formal category.

We recently surveyed advisers to ask what their main method of client segmentation was (see chart). The largest single group – 32 per cent – said they do not segment clients.

Most of these were smaller firms where management practices tend to be rather informal. At a recent roundtable of advisers, one told us that he used just two segments: those he was prepared to serve and those he wasn’t.

But two-thirds of advisers say they do segment clients. The most common method of segmentation (27 per cent) is to categorise clients by their capital values. The clients with more money typically have more complicated needs and therefore require the more extensive service, although this is by no means always the case.

Client segmentation debate thrown open by Prod rules

We know from FCA data that most advisers are still charging their fees – or at least the bulk of them – on the basis of a percentage of assets under advice. So, clients’ capital values are more or less a proxy for fees chargeable – or the monetary value of the client to the adviser firm.

In fact, one in 10 advisers tell us they segment directly on the metric of fees chargeable. So, in total, more than a third of advisers (37 per cent) segment their clients directly or indirectly according to the fees they charge.

Just under a 10th of advisers segment their clients based on each clients’ life stage and 21 per cent segment on the basis of demand for their services.

One key question is: are any of these satisfactory ways to segment clients? This is a particular worry in relation to the FCA’s PROD rules, where advisers are required to distribute products to clients in the target market for those products.

The FCA rulebook requires manufacturers to identify types of clients by their “needs, characteristics and objectives” (in PROD 3.2.8, since you ask) and distributors (that is advisers in non-FCA speak) must take each manufacturer’s identified target market into account (PROD 3.3.1).

So, characterising clients according to their fees charged or the value of their assets seems to constitute a significant mismatch.

We’ve heard a fair bit of adviser hostility to PROD, with many regarding it a box-ticking exercise on top of what they have always done at client level. So, most advisers seem to think they have got PROD covered on a client-by-client basis – but, at a collective level, perhaps not so much.

Aside from any regulatory issues, there are additional benefits for advisers from more sophisticated client segmentation. Producing much better management information could go a long way towards understanding what’s really going on in their business, who their clients are and what those clients need from their advisers.

It could also make monitoring of products and services more efficient. Many advisers already use models to manage portfolios of multiple clients with similar risk profiles. Segmentation brings a similar approach to advisers’ other services, offering a more efficient and consistent approach for clients with similar needs.

Richard Bradley is research director at Platforum


Tony Wickenden

Tony Wickenden: Discretionary and bare trusts- what you need to know

Everything you and your clients need to know about the most popular trusts The subject of trusts can generate some complex tax and legal questions, so it is important to remind ourselves of the fundamentals. Trusts can be extremely useful not only for inheritance tax planning but also in ensuring money ends up in the […]


FCA clarifies providers not responsible for suitability on DB transfers

The watchdog has confirmed pension providers are not responsible for the suitability of advice on defined benefit transfers Money Marketing can confirm. A letter the watchdog sent to product providers last week about their DB transfer procedures inspired a number of conflicting interpretations. In a Dear CEO letter sent to the heads of major providers, the FCA […]


State pension court showdown set for summer

A judicial review about changes to the state pension age for millions of women born in the 1950s will take place from 5 to 6 June. The Department for Work and Pensions has confirmed that last November’s decision by the High Court to grant permission for a judicial review will go ahead in the summer. […]

UK advisers in firing line as JP Morgan eyes staff cuts

JP Morgan is set to axe hundreds of workers across its wealth and asset management divisions after a review of its staffing. Bloomberg reports that the New York City-headquartered investment bank is “laying off wealth management workers” as part of what a spokesman terms a “normal course of business review”. In the UK, JP Morgan […]

Investment Clock Economic report: Solid, but sideways to slower

Senior Economist, Melanie Baker shares our latest Investment Clock Economic report, providing a deep-dive look into the current economic backdrop. Melanie observes that global growth continues at a solid pace for now, supported by still accommodative monetary policy and looser US fiscal policy.  She acknowledges that there are more signs that growth has peaked and […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm