View more on these topics

Platform plan calls for split charges

Ascentric is calling for platform charges to be split into four elements to improve transparency in the retail distribution review.

Managing director Hugo Thorman says the RDR should go further than plans to split the adviser and product provider’s charges so fund manager and platform provider’s charges are also clearly distinguished.

He says: “What we like to do is split adviser, product provider, wrap platform and fund manager charges. That is the fairest thing to do so the client can see very readily what each is costing.

“For those who oppose this idea, it is either because they cannot do it because of their systems or there is some cross-subsidy taking place that they do not want people to know about.”

He believes it is inevitable the FSA will call for a separation between investment management and platform charges after its review of the platform market.

Skandia head of proposition marketing Peter Jordan says: “Transparency is fine but if that results in a complicated picture being presented to the client, then it will call into doubt some of the benefits claimed from this approach. The danger is if you go to the umpteenth degree to unbundle in the interest of transparency, you will largely be left with a marketplace where customers do not understand what their costs are.”

Recommended

Confidence is starting to flow

Last month, I mentioned the findings of the IMA’s third Great British Investor Report – based on a survey of over 4,000 retail investors in May – which suggested that investor confidence may be on the up but it should be noted that this was against a background of the majority of investors thinking that the FTSE 100 would not recover to the 6,000 level for over two years, so, more of a case of cautious optimism.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment