View more on these topics

Pimfa throws its weight behind Priips KID dissenters

Advice and wealth management trade body Pimfa has joined the Investment Association and an FCA working group in calls for a review of new Priips rules.

In a statement, Pimfa says concerns expressed before the rules came into force on 1 January about flaws in the design of the key information documents have now been realised.

The statement says: “Over recent weeks, product manufacturers, wealth managers, financial advisers and industry commentators have drawn attention to instances where the calculation methods mandated by the Priips regulation result in product risk and performance data that is not fit for purpose – information that is anything but ‘clear, fair and not misleading’ and that does nothing to help investors compare different products or to make properly informed investment decisions.”

The Investment Association has already called for an “urgent” review of the new KID saying it was potentially misleading to clients.

That call was echoed by the FCA working group tasked with creating a transparent costs disclosure template, which said Priips’ language “may not improve comparability” of funds, especially in the way it describes how a fund is managed.

Pimfa wants an “urgent review” of the regulation as well asking the FCA to clarify its 24 January statement that said advisers could address potentially misleading statements by providing additional information to investors.

Pimfa chief executive Liz Field says: “In instances where KIDs provide misleading information – regardless of product providers’ compliance with detailed KID content requirements – advisers and distributors should not be expected to ‘paper over the cracks’ by providing ‘additional explanation’ to investors.”

Field adds: “The ad hoc correction of documents that are a matter of regulatory requirement should not be undertaken lightly – as well as creating further inconsistencies in the way individual products are presented to investors, such an approach may result in wholly unreasonable liabilities for advisers and distributors.”



Warning over misleading Priips document for investment trusts

Advisers must use common sense when selecting investment trusts through the new Priips’ Key Information Document as it could be misleading for investors. That is the view of analyst Numis Securities, which has published a report about the KID and investment trusts. Priips, which will apply to a wide range of firms including banks, insurers, […]


Letters sent to FCA from boards of Baillie Gifford trusts over misleading KIDs

Several independent boards of Baillie Gifford’s investment trust clients have written to the FCA about concerns with new Priips key information document rules. Baillie Gifford’s concerns relate to disclosure rules for the documents. It says these are based on past performance and could lead to investors being misled. Baillie Gifford compliance and legal partner Graham Laybourn […]


Capita replaced as Prudential’s pension administrator

Capita has been replaced as the pensions administrator of M&G Prudential after an open market tender. The administration of more than four million life and pensions contracts at M&G Prudential will move from Capita to Diligenta, the FCA-regulated subsidiary of Tata Consultancy Services on 31 July. According to documents published a decade ago, the value […]

Ros Altmann

Ros Altmann: HMRC must rethink SSAS measures

This April, SSASs may be hit by new HM Revenue & Customs rules that could undermine thousands of bona fide pension schemes, unless the Treasury can be persuaded to recognise the dangers of its plans. The Government rightly wants to crack down on scams and has recognised SSASs can pose a risk. Even though these […]


Lifetime allowance

Jim Grant, Senior Product Insight & Technical Support Analyst Benefit crystallisation events and the lifetime allowance charge – all you need to know. The lifetime allowance (LTA) is the maximum amount that can be crystallised before a charge applies. It used to be £1.8m but it’s steadily decreased to £1m. There’s a whole list of […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Clients are receiving misleading information. It was flagged clearly and strongly before it happened.

    Presumably, if this was down to a firm’s actions the regulator would be down on them hard. But it’s regulation that’s causing this so it’s different, isn’t it?

    Importantly, it’s ongoing, it’s happening now and clients are making investment decisions based on misleading information. The regulator’s opportunity for action is now. Is this the new, improved FCA or just the old FSA with a different coat?

Leave a comment