View more on these topics

PI fears grow as historic DB transfer liabilities haunt market

Advisers are fearful restrictions in professional indemnity insurance cover are spreading in response to defined benefit transfer risks.

Financial planners have told Money Marketing that insurers are continuing to take a sceptical view of any DB transfer business amid a slew of negative headlines around British Steel and other well-documented DB scheme failures.

Some have said they can no longer get run-off cover for past business, in addition to limited options for forward-looking business.

Managing director of Cheshire-based IFA Strategic Investment Solutions Brendon Jones argues the market has become tighter since May, when the FCA decided against allowing advisers to start from a neutral assumption regarding DB transfer suitability, maintaining its position that the majority of clients would not be suitable for a DB transfer.

Jones has been trying to renew his PI policy since May. The deadline is 31 July, and he feared he may miss it when speaking to Money Marketing just ahead of that date.

This is despite going to multiple brokers compared to just one in the past.

He says: “Everyone’s PI renewals up until [the FCA’s announcement] had an easier path. Since then PI insurers are using the FCA statement. It’s basically impossible to get PI. One of the main reasons is the change in the FCA’s stance.”

Strategic Investment Solutions has been operating since 2004. It has four general practitioner IFAs, with a pension transfer specialist operating as a trading style of the company since 2009.

PI premiums jump 21% amid DB transfer fears

Jones says: “It looks for us like we are not going to get PI which is a disaster. We are almost having sleepless nights. We’ve never had any trouble, we just do our work and now we can’t get insurance.”

“For a firm like us it’s not a good outcome. They won’t even give us run-off cover quotes so we can’t say we can defer for a while until the market sorts itself out.

Former Juno Moneta Capital Management financial planner Andrew Boyt says he expects the true measure of the PI market to come in the third and fourth quarters when more advisers are renewing their policies.

He says: “The aggregate basis of PI is the problem. Most other contingent liability contracts are based on who held the cover when the event took place, not when it was notified.”

“With 30 years of aggregated liability in some firms, underwriting is harsh. It can also be seen as anti-competitive since providers won’t want to compete for past liabilities on this basis, whereas an annually renewable contract based on recent claims experience and probability of claims during the next year on standalone basis would increase competition.”

The FCA is currently weighing up a number of changes to the PI market as part of its consultation on Financial Services Compensation Scheme reform. These include preventing PI policies from stopping the FSCS from making a claim on the policy because they were able to exclude claims where the adviser becomes insolvent.

However, it has already decided against requiring IFAs to hold a surety bond as a form of run-off cover or hold money in trust should certain business lines be excluded from a PI policy.

The consultation closed this week.

Aegon pensions director Steven Cameron says the FCA must give “top priority” to DB transfer issues when considering the future of PI reform.

He says: “The FCA’s proposal to ban PI insurance policies from placing limits on claims where the adviser firm is insolvent have merit. It doesn’t seem fair to allow some adviser firms to opt for a limited, and so cheaper PI insurance policy, which then risks passing a higher liability over to the FSCS should the firm become insolvent. With no PI limits, overall FSCS levies should fall, benefitting all advisers.

“However, there are growing concerns adviser firms offering defined benefit transfer advice are facing challenges finding affordable PI. We can’t afford removing claims limits to lead to further shrinkage in the PI market, potentially denying thousands of customers from access to advice on DB transfers. We’re urging the FCA to consider these two issues together, with the top priority given to the DB transfer issue.

“Importantly, the FSCS should be a backstop when other means of compensating clients fail, and appropriate PI insurance is an important part of that ‘first line of defence’.”

Smaller advice firms taking the hit on PI costs

Fifteen large PI insurers service around 67 per cent of the personal investment market, according to FCA statistics. One dropped out between when the data was collected last year and when the consultation was published in May.

When asked by the FCA about the likely impact of preventing exclusions for insolvent firms, one provider said PI premiums might increase 25 per cent as a result, and seven said they might exit the market if the change went ahead.

Six said they either did not exclude or could not provide an estimate that there would be an increase, and these made up nearly two-thirds of the market share of the sample, the FCA found.

Nearly half of advisers have switched PI providers in the past five years, suggesting a competitive market where any cost increases from the FCA’s change could be mitigated by advisers changing who they get coverage from.

Recommended

Business-Handshake-Finance-Deal-700.jpg

Sanlam adds first advice firm to partner programme

Sanlam has announced that advice firm Ergowealth has become the first to join a new partnership programme it launched in 2017.   Marlow-based Ergowealth, founded in 2013, will bring £165 million in assets under advice from 290 private clients to the partnership programme.   Providing investment and lifestyle financial planning services to private clients, businesses, charities, and […]

UK-London-Westminster-Big-Ben-Bus-480.jpg
5

MPs urge Hammond to overhaul pension tax relief

The government has received renewed calls to encourage greater saving through introducing a flat rate of pension tax relief. In a report from the Treasury select committee on household savings, MPs say the government should give “serious consideration” not just to a flat rate of pension tax relief, but also promote greater understanding that it […]

Ros Altmann
28

Ros Altmann: Brexit uncertainty not over yet for advisers

Given all the turmoil in politics, I want to look at Brexit this week. Parliament is so engrossed in this ongoing drama that other policy issues are being pushed aside. The prime minister’s Chequers cabinet awayday produced a framework on which negotiations with the EU might be based, with proposals that would acknowledge the needs […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. This mess will not be sorted out for some while This has given Saint Frank of Pensions a free reign to settle some old political scores with Cameron and Osborne. He knows the government is far too busy dealing with Britex to do anything and he been given carte blanche to run riot with his own political agenda

  2. A problem that I have been trying to highlight for some time.

    But my headache is not from being unable to get PI. I must stop banging my head against a wall!

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com