View more on these topics

Peter Chadborn: BDMs are out of reach

Chadborn-Peter-2010-700x450.jpg

I have just received an email from a fellow adviser asking why we are losing all the good business development managers. It is off the back of a message from a decent BDM saying he is being moved on. Of course, people move on and the more successful the role is fulfilled, the more likely a step-up will be offered. But this is just a minor frustration against the backdrop in perpetual decline in support to advisers from life offices.

I get the economics. We appreciate that life offices cannot offer face-to-face support to every advice firm. In fact, we do not really want face-to-face support. Telephone-based just is fine. We also do not want BDMs ringing us every week; that is not a good use of their time or ours. I have been told that if advisers did not sell on price alone, driving down premiums and putting pressure on insurers profits, there may be more capacity to provide IFA support. Maybe so. I am also told that the direct-to-consumer market is demanding life office focus. Quite right. But what prevails in the advice market today is advisers on first-name terms with just a few BDMs, with others requiring a back office system search (only to find they have moved on) or a call to a central number to talk to the appointed “support team”.

Herein lies the problem. We are just a small IFA firm that writes a bit of protection, so why does it matter what we do or think? Our business levels are insignificant, right? Our size and model represents the vast majority of the IFA market, however, so that is the majority of the market largely off-radar.

Go to any given protection-based conference in the last 10 years and there will be some common themes: how do we grow the protection market? How do we close the protection gap? How do we increase engagement? I think we are broadly in agreement that most people do not choose to buy protection. The concept has to be positioned (sold). Yet I would hazard a guess that most protection-writers could name only three or four BDMs. This is an obvious disconnect.

We take our protection advice very seriously but I would have to say we have got to where we are despite life office support, not because of it. The protection industry is full of bright, enthusiastic and highly motivated people but these are the senior people, the decision-makers one is lucky enough to meet if one does stuff in the press and wins the odd award. We have had and still have some really good BDMs. The problem is with consistency and reach. Not enough firms get the attention they need to engender their engagement with protection advice. I believe this to be a primary factor in the stagnation of new protection business across the industry. Unless something changes, increasingly fewer advisers will get support and training, and they will write less protection business as a result.

Peter Chadborn is director and adviser at Plan Money

Recommended

Pension-pot-700.jpg
1

Pot follows member under threat as Govt delays reforms

The Department for Work and Pensions could scrap controversial plans for the pot follows member model for automatic pension transfers, Money Marketing can reveal. The DWP is preparing to announce a delay in the reforms until after auto-enrolment has been fully rolled out in 2018. The Government had originally planned to introduce the initiative on […]

Cicutti-Nic-2014-MM-700.jpg
13

Nic Cicutti: FCA needs to point the way on drawdown

Those of a younger generation might not remember this, but there was a time when for many people the most popular form of long distance travel used to be hitchhiking. Nowadays many people worry about being picked up by, or giving lifts to strangers. But 30 or 40 years ago, if you were skint, did […]

Zurich building 480
1

Zurich ditches £5.6bn RSA bid

Zurich has been forced to pull out of a £5.6bn takeover of RSA. The Swiss firm announced a bid in July, but it has pulled out at the last minute blaming a $275m (£176m) hit resulting from explosions in the Chinese port of Tianjin , the Telegraph reports. An RSA statement says: “Zurich has confirmed […]

2

Nick Bamford: The loose ends from rushed pension reforms

I wonder what goes through a politician’s mind when he makes a big policy announcement? When the Chancellor announced “the end of annuities” in March last year, I seriously doubt he had thought through the full ramifications of pensions freedom and choice. It was, let’s face it, a bit of a vote grabber. His big […]

When will US rates rise?

By Felix Wintle, Investment Director & Head of US Equities The most recent communication from Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellen has put the market’s sights on September as the most likely month for the first rate rise. This is due to the stronger than expected economic data of late, particularly in employment and housing, which […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Great article Pete. I think it goes without saying, face to face contact whether it be advice or BDM support builds a stronger relationship.

  2. Totally agree. I have a great relationship with 4 BDMs. The others seem non-existent despite numerous requests to have one assigned. It’s no surprise that as a firm we place more business through the insurers with which we have a face-to-face contact.

Leave a comment