View more on these topics

Pensions regulator proposes ‘extreme’ ban on new SSASs

Payment-Fine-Currency-Money-700.jpg

A proposal from The Pensions Regulator to ban pension transfers into small self-administered schemes and to consider stopping new SSAS arrangements being set up have been branded “extreme” and “ill considered”.

In a blog on TPR’s website, regulatory policy executive director Andrew Warwick-Thompson suggests three measures to curb pension scamming, including a ban on SSASs.

Warwick-Thompson says: “SSASs are exempt from many of the legal duties designed to protect members that are applicable to larger schemes. Further, the ease with which a SSAS can be established, and the minimal legal and reporting requirements for such schemes, has made them the vehicle of choice for criminals setting up a scam.

“SSASs have gone far beyond the scope of the policy intent that created them. Self-invested personal pensions, which are the subject of far tougher regulation by the FCA, are a safer vehicle for consumers who want control over the investment of their pension pot.”

He adds: “I believe that pension transfers to SSAS arrangements ought to be banned. In fact, to put a stop to their abuse, I believe that an outright ban on the establishment of any more SSAS arrangements also warrants serious consideration.”

AJ Bell senior analyst Tom Selby agrees stricter controls should be placed around SSASs to protect against scammers.

But he says “TPR’s extreme recommendations risk throwing the baby out with the bathwater”.

Selby says: “There is nothing inherently wrong with a SSAS as a product and for many business owners, particularly where there are multiple people involved, they offer a level of flexibility and control that cannot be found in any other type of pension.

“Rather than destroying a legitimate pension savings vehicle that is used appropriately by many UK businesses, the Government should reintroduce mandatory professional trustees for SSASs.

“This would make it very difficult for criminals to abuse the SSAS structure to facilitate pension scams and would protect savers without taking the draconian and ill-considered measure proposed by TPR.”

Recommended

Stockmarket-Stock-Market-FTSE-Performance-700x450.jpg

Sipp and SSAS provider to raise £179m in stock market listing

Sipp and SSAS provider Xafinity is looking to raise £179m by floating on the London Stock Exchange. The initial public offering is expected to complete this Thursday, offering up nearly 95 per cent of the company in shares, giving it a total market capitalisation of £190m. Net proceeds are estimated at £46m, which will be used to […]

Martin Tilley: Why 2017 could be the year of the SSAS

As advisers and providers focus on their growth strategies for the year ahead, thoughts turn to what was successful over the last 12 months. One area of growth was new SSASs. But we may be seeing changes on the horizon. 2016 is likely to be remembered as the year the regulator got tough on scammers. […]

Money-Cash-Coins-GBP-Pounds-UK-700x450.jpg

TPR reaches £255m settlement to safeguard DB scheme

The Pensions Regulator has reached a £255m settlement with industrial thread manufacturer Coats Group to protect two of the company’s defined benefit schemes. TPR first warned Coats in 2013 and 2014 it was considering making an order for the company to financially support three DB schemes sponsored by firms within the Coats corporate group. Coats […]

Sierra Leone cover image - thumbnail

White paper — Sierra Leone International Insights

Jelf Employee Benefits assesses the areas that employers should be aware of when considering operating in Sierra Leone, including healthcare access, delivery and insurance provisions. This report draws on various sources to highlight specific considerations for this emerging jewel in West Africa.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Christine Brightwell 15th February 2017 at 5:12 pm

    Many SSAS already have professional trustees anyway. If a transfer request looks odd it is simple to require scheme documentation to review, check the member links to the company which is employer to the SSAS etc. A bit of good old fashioned due diligence by trustees who actually know what they are doing and know what to look for goes a very long way.

    Box ticking, ill informed announcements and general de skilling to save money in parts of the pensions industry allow the “baddies” to have a chance to cause disruption. Very depressing

Leave a comment