View more on these topics

Pensions minister faces calls to boost auto-enrolment rates


Unions and pension providers have written to the pensions minister urging him not to postpone a planned increase in auto-enrolment rates.

The Trades Union Congress, Age UK, the Association of Consulting Actuaries, the People’s Pension and Now Pensions have all written to Richard Harrington asking him to press ahead with raising the combined minimum earnings threshold from the current 2 per cent to 5 per cent in 2018 and 8 per cent by 2019, the Financial Times reports.

The letter comes after comments made by Harrington in an interview last week that he may want to let the reforms “bed in” before taking any further decision on rates.

The signatories to the letter say that without a “long term vision” of satisfactory rates, workers could be left with “inadequate savings to provide for a good standard of living,” and that Harrington should make a decision on further rate rises at the earliest opportunity.

The signatories say: “The 2017 review of automatic enrolment provides a valuable opportunity to create a vision for pension saving and retirement outcomes, and to begin building a consensual approach towards defining the role of automatic enrolment in future pensions and savings policy.

“The forthcoming review should therefore be as wide-ranging as possible.”

Others in the pensions industry have spoken out against the auto-enrolment timetable, however, including Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association and lobby group the CBI.

The organisations argue that the impact of increasing rates on businesses and workers should be assessed before it is moved further.



Govt reviews how to auto-enrol self-employed

The Government will examine how to bring in the self-employed into pension saving as part of its review into the success of auto-enrolment next year. The terms of the review will be set out in the coming weeks. In an interview with the Financial Times, pensions minister Richard Harrington says finding a way to auto-enrol […]


Pensions Regulator gets backing for tough stance on auto-enrolment fines

Pensions experts have defended The Pensions Regulator’s use of rapidly increasing fines to tackle auto-enrolment non-compliance. Last week TPR data revealed it had handed out 576 escalating penalty notices between July and September, over 500 more than it had given out in the previous quarter. The number of £400 fixed penalties issued also rose from […]


Auto-enrol fines spike as firms miss deadlines

The Pensions Regulator issued 576 escalating penalty notices to employers that failed to comply with auto-enrolment rules between July and September, more than 15 times the amount in the previous three months. Between April and June, TPR handed out 38 escalating penalty notices. Employers that receive such a notice will receive a penalty of between £50 […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. There’s a danger people will see AE as another failed ‘stakeholder-type’ initiative who then decide to opt out because a 1% employer contribution isn’t sufficient justification to remain in a scheme.

    Furthermore, the ‘time cost’ of starting and then running with AE for many is relatively high compared to the actual cost of contributions – yes we’re in a low wage growth environment BUT this has been in the pipeline for years and has already been kicked back a few months – the danger of kicking it further down the line will add support to the argument from some employers that it’s a waste of time and won’t work – likely leading to an increase in non-compliance.

  2. The vast majority of staff I present to fully accept the need to do something about saving for their own retirement. If HMG kicks the increase to the right – again – the whole project will risk being devalued and more people will Opt Out IMO.
    The fact that HM Treasury will not “give away” as much tax relief is of course totally unconnected…

  3. I predict that AE will be the next ‘mis-selling’ scandal. The contribution rates are paltry and will not provide a decent retirement income. How can anyone believe that? A decent DB scheme used to cost 15-20% of payroll, a DC arrangement paying a fraction of that amount will simply not suffice. Many people would love to fund for a decent pension in retirement but don’t have enough disposable income. I really fear not just for my own retirement but for many future generations as the fundamentals of living for most people can easily be at least as much they earn. Something big has to change e.g. housing and transport costs and expectations of being able to have all the material things that are now taken for granted. E.g. new cars, nights out, expensive holidays & weddings! (The amount some spend on the latter is eyewateringly high and definitely not ‘necessary’!)

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm